Skip to content
AS
Alonso Sala
CRIMINAL LAWYERS
ES

Article 417 of the Criminal Code

TÍTULO XIX — Delitos contra la Administración pública

Full text

1. La autoridad o funcionario público que revelare secretos o informaciones de los que tenga conocimiento por razón de su oficio o cargo y que no deban ser divulgados, incurrirá en la pena de multa de doce a dieciocho meses e inhabilitación especial para empleo o cargo público por tiempo de uno a tres años. Si de la revelación a que se refiere el párrafo anterior resultara grave daño para la causa pública o para tercero, la pena será de prisión de uno a tres años, e inhabilitación especial para empleo o cargo público por tiempo de tres a cinco años. 2. Si se tratara de secretos de un particular, las penas serán las de prisi��n de dos a cuatro años, multa de doce a dieciocho meses, y suspensión de empleo o cargo público por tiempo de uno a tres años.

Explanation and defense

What Article 417 of the Criminal Code punishes

Article 417 punishes the disclosure of secrets and information by an authority or public official, among the offences against public administration. It sanctions an authority or official who discloses secrets or information known to them by reason of their office or position and which should not be divulged. Unlike the discovery and disclosure of secrets in Articles 197 and following, here the person accessed the information legitimately by reason of their office, and the reproach falls on its improper disclosure.

Penalty

Disclosure carries a fine of twelve to eighteen months and special disqualification from public employment or office for one to three years. If the disclosure results in serious harm to the public cause or to a third party, the penalty rises to one to three years in prison and special disqualification for three to five years. Where the information disclosed is a private individual's secrets, the penalty is two to four years in prison, a fine of twelve to eighteen months, and suspension from public employment or office for one to three years.

Defense strategy

The defense should examine whether the information disclosed was genuinely confidential and non-divulgable, and how the official accessed it, a factor that is decisive in separating this offence from the discovery of secrets under Article 197, as the case law linked below clarifies. Establishing the absence or presence of the serious harm that aggravates the penalty is also relevant.

gavel

Case law discussed

The line between disclosing secrets and breaching official secrets lies in how the information was accessed

This analysis discusses a ruling of the Criminal Chamber of the Spanish Supreme Court. You can see its summary and full citation on our case-law page.

balanceView the ruling· Appeal 3274/2023arrow_forward

Quick reference

Orientative data computed from the highest prison term mentioned in this article. Aggravated or mitigated subtypes, non-custodial penalties and concurrence rules may alter the outcome in each specific case.

Highest prison term mentioned

3 years

Classification (arts. 13 & 33 CP)

Less serious offense

Limitation period (art. 131 CP)

5 years

call