
Criminal Lawyers in Gender-Based Violence
Specialist criminal defence in gender-based violence proceedings
Gender-based violence is violence exercised by a man against a person who is or has been his partner. Physical abuse and minor threats or coercion are punished under Article 153 of the Spanish Criminal Code (CP) with imprisonment of 6 months to 1 year; habitual abuse (Art. 173.2 CP) carries up to 3 years' imprisonment, plus a restraining order. With over 15 years of experience, we examine the credibility of testimony and messages, and the right not to testify under Art. 416 of the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act (LECrim), to build the defence from the first assistance onward.
You have been reported for gender-based violence: what it means and what happens next
This is the fastest procedure in the Spanish criminal system: the complaint is filed, the court hears the protection order application within hours, and the case often continues as a fast-track trial. That first hearing decides the measures that will shape the suspect's life for months — a restraining order, a ban on communication, use of the family home, contact arrangements — and it happens before there is virtually any evidence. Art. 153.1 CP carries 6 months to 1 year's imprisonment or 31 to 80 days of community service, and in every case a ban on holding or carrying weapons for 1 year and 1 day to 3 years, for causing psychological harm or a minor injury, or for striking or physically mistreating without causing injury, where the victim is or has been the offender's wife or a woman linked by an analogous emotional relationship, with or without cohabitation.
What to do (and what not to do) before making a statement
- Do not attend the protection order hearing alone. It is the hearing with the most immediate consequences and it takes place at very short notice. Having a lawyer you trust from that moment is what allows evidence to be proposed rather than simply hearing the measure imposed.
- Comply with the measure to the letter, however unfair it seems. Any contact — even if she initiates it, even through a third party or via social media — is a separate breach under Art. 468 CP and destroys the defence of the main case.
- Immediately gather what documents the relationship. Messages from the days before and after, location data, witnesses and any ongoing family proceedings. This material is lost or becomes inaccessible within weeks.
- Do not publicise the complaint or discuss the case in public. Comments about the complainant are added to the file and can open a second front for defamation or an offence against moral integrity under Art. 173.2 CP.
Urgent Defence
In the current legal landscape, defense in Gender Violence (VioGén) proceedings represents one of the most complex and delicate challenges for any criminal lawyer. The enactment of Organic Law 1/2004 (LIVG) established a comprehensive protection system which, while born with the laudable intention of protecting victims from an undeniable social scourge, has generated in forensic practice a procedural asymmetry that challenges the presumption of innocence. This is not an opinion, but a palpable reality in Violence Against Women Courts: the accused male starts with a structural disadvantage. The mere filing of a complaint activates an almost automatic police and judicial protocol that, in the immense majority of cases, entails the immediate arrest of the man ("spending the night in the cell" is the standard, regardless of the severity of the reported facts or the real risk) and the request for a protection order that includes restraining orders and prohibition of communication.
This "automation" of precautionary measures responds to a risk prevention logic that legislators and society have prioritized, but which often collides head-on with the fundamental rights of the investigated. We frequently find ourselves in situations where the only prosecution evidence is the complainant's testimony. And although the Supreme Court requires that said testimony pass the "credibility test" (absence of subjective incredibility, verisimilitude, and persistence in incrimination), the inertia of specialized courts tends to grant reinforced veracity to the victim's account. This creates, de facto, a situation close to the reversal of the burden of proof: it is the accused who is compelled to demonstrate his innocence, proving negative facts (that something did NOT happen), which is diabolical from an evidentiary point of view.
A critical, and often taboo, aspect that we address with total rigor and without complexes, is the existence of instrumental complaints. Although their existence is politically minimized, the reality of criminal law firms shows us cases where the criminal route of gender violence is used as a spurious tool to obtain tactical advantages in divorce or contentious breakup proceedings. A conviction, or even a mere valid restraining order, can automatically determine the attribution of the use of the family home, the custody of minor children, and the establishment of alimony, in addition to annulling any possibility of joint custody. Identifying these "spurious motives" (revenge, resentment, economic interest) is vital to dismantle the credibility of the prosecution testimony and is one of the cornerstones of our defense strategy.
The social stigma accompanying a gender violence complaint is devastating. The label of "abuser" is socially imposed long before there is a final sentence, causing what we call an anticipated "bench penalty": loss of employment, social isolation, breakdown of family ties, and often irreversible reputational damage, even if acquittal is finally achieved. Therefore, the defense cannot be limited to the strictly legal; it must be a comprehensive defense that protects the client's dignity and combats the prejudices that permeate the procedure. We are not here to morally judge our clients' relationships, which are usually complex and bidirectional in their conflicts; we are here to ensure that this complexity is not unjustly simplified into a criminal conviction for a crime that carries indelible criminal records and prison sentences.
At Alonso Sala, our defense methodology in VioGén is proactive and meticulous. We do not wait for the trial. From the first assistance at the police station, we work on collecting exculpatory evidence: forensic dump of instant messaging (WhatsApp, Telegram) to reconstruct the true context of the relationship and demonstrate whether there was a climate of violence or, on the contrary, relational normality or mutual conflict; location of environment witnesses; and psychological expert reports if necessary. We know we are facing a powerful legal machine and extreme social sensitivity, and precisely for that reason, our technical defense must be impeccable, rigorous, and courageous to assert the material truth of the facts against the system's automatisms.
Fast-Track Trials
Fast-Track Trials
It is a speed trap. In 48h they offer penalty reduction if you confess. If innocent, we brake the process, request evidence, and take the case to Criminal Court to prepare a real defense, not a surrender.
Credibility of the Testimony: The Three Requirements
We attack the 3 veracity requirements: Is there subjective incredibility (prior hate)? Are there peripheral corroborations (medical reports, witnesses)? Is there persistence? If one fails, no conviction.
Protection Order, Family Home and Custody
The protection order ruling decide who keeps house and kids. We fight in that hearing to prevent criminal reporting being used as a shortcut to win civil custody.
Digital Evidence: WhatsApp Messages
We extract and notarize your WhatsApps. They often contain proof that the report is a reaction to a breakup or that the alleged "coercion" was a normal conversation.
Protection Order The Art. 544 ter LECrim Hearing
Decided in an urgent hearing (544 ter appearance) hours after arrest. It is the most important moment of the case. The judge decides on your liberty and your family.
Restraining order (min. 500m), communication ban, and residence prohibition. Immediate removal from home.
Home use and provisional custody attributed to victim. Visitation restricted or suspended.
Active insertion income, free legal aid, priority social housing, and employment protection for the victim.
False Accusations
Physical & Psychological Mistreatment
Technical defense against accusations of physical abuse, threats, and insults in a relationship context.
Restraining Orders
Technical opposition to protection order. We work to avoid expulsion from home and loss of contact with children.
Breach of Order
Defense in crimes of breach of sentence or precautionary measure. WhatsApps, calls, and chance encounters.
Instrumental Complaints
Defense against using criminal proceedings to gain tactical advantages in divorce, custody, and home use.
Why Choose Us?
Because we are independent and don't depend on political correctness. We defend the client against the system's automatic machinery. If innocent, we go to trial until the end; if there's risk, we negotiate the best exit to minimize damage.
We know the criteria applied by the Courts for Violence against Women and the specialised appeal sections. We know which arguments work and which don't. Your freedom and your relationship with your children are our only priority.
- ✓ Specialists in annulling unjust protection orders.
- ✓ Aggressive defense against instrumental divorce reports.
- ✓ Immediate availability at police station.
- ✓ Experience in appeal resources at Provincial Court.
Frequently Asked Questions — Gender-Based Violence
What exactly is 'Gender Violence'?
What if my partner falsely reports me?
Can I be arrested for a verbal argument?
What does a Protection Order imply?
What is the right not to testify (Art. 416)?
What is a Rapid Trial?
Can I see my kids with a restraining order?
What if she calls me and we meet?
Is checking her phone a crime?
What is the VioGén protocol?
Are WhatsApps proof?
Can I be convicted 'on her word alone'?
What is habitual abuse?
Do I lose my house if reported?
What are cross-complaints?
Do records affect visa renewal?
Can a neighbor/doctor report?
What is a telematic device (Cometa)?
What if I break a door but don't touch her?
How long do records last?
Can I be convicted without medical injury report?
Family Crimes and Domestic Violence Defense
Which Offences Are Prosecuted as Gender-Based Violence
Gender-based violence in Spain is not a single offence but a set of provisions that apply where the victim is or was the offender's wife or a woman bound to him by an analogous relationship of affection, with or without cohabitation. Four provisions carry the bulk of the caseload:
- Article 153.1 CP — physical abuse or minor injury. Causing psychological harm or a minor injury, or striking or physically mistreating without causing injury: 6 months to 1 year in prison, or 31 to 80 days of community service, and in every case deprivation of the right to keep and carry weapons for 1 year and 1 day to 3 years. The penalty is imposed in its upper half where the offence takes place in the presence of children, using weapons, or in the shared or the victim's home.
- Article 171.4 CP — minor threats. Threatening a current or former partner in a minor way: the same range of 6 months to 1 year in prison or 31 to 80 days of community service, plus the weapons prohibition.
- Article 172.2 CP — minor coercion. Coercing a current or former partner in a minor way, with the same penalty. Conduct that would be a minor offence between strangers is a full offence here.
- Article 173.2 CP — habitual abuse. Habitually exercising physical or psychological violence within the couple or the family: 6 months to 3 years in prison, imposed without prejudice to the separate offences committed in each individual act.
Breaching a restraining order or a precautionary measure is punished separately under Article 468.2 CP with 6 months to 1 year in prison, and the victim's consent does not exempt the offender.
The Procedure: VioGén Risk Assessment and the Violence against Women Sections
What sets these cases apart is as much procedural as substantive. Two mechanisms shape the file from the first hours:
- VioGén. The police risk-assessment system. Since the 2025 Instruction (VioGén-2) it assesses four levels — low, medium, high and extreme — and the level assigned determines the protective measures deployed and weighs on whether the prosecutor asks for pre-trial detention. It is an assessment, not a finding of guilt, and it can and should be reviewed when the circumstances change.
- The Violence against Women Sections. Since the reform of the courts these cases are investigated by specialised sections, not by an ordinary investigation section. The protection order is decided at an urgent hearing under Article 544 ter LECrim within hours of the arrest, and it can combine criminal measures (a restraining order and a ban on communication), civil measures (use of the family home, provisional custody and maintenance) and welfare measures. That hearing, not the trial, is where most of the practical damage is done or avoided.
Two further points decide a large share of these cases: the right of the complainant, as a relative, not to testify against the accused (Article 416 LECrim), and the Supreme Court's three-part test for a conviction on the complainant's evidence alone — absence of subjective incredibility, corroboration by peripheral data, and persistence in the incrimination.
Where This Page Ends and Another Begins
This page covers violence against a woman by a partner or former partner: Articles 153, 171.4, 172.2 and 173.2 CP and their procedure. Two neighbouring areas have their own pages, and they are frequently confused:
- If the accusation concerns conduct against sexual freedom — sexual assault, sexual harassment, sextortion, the removal of a condom — the applicable provisions are Articles 178 to 194 CP and the analysis turns on consent, not on the relationship. See sexual offences. Note that the two can concur in the same file, and that since 3 October 2025 the Violence against Women Sections investigate every offence against sexual freedom where the victim is a woman (Article 14.5 LECrim), so the specialised court does not by itself mean the charge is a gender-based violence offence.
- If there is no current or former intimate relationship with a woman — violence against children, parents, siblings or a cohabiting vulnerable person — the case is domestic violence, with a different subjective scope and, in Article 153.2 CP, a lower range of 3 months to 1 year.
Getting that boundary right at the outset is not academic: it changes the applicable provision, the court, and the sentencing range. If you have been arrested or summonsed, call +34 91 078 65 74 before making any statement.
Domestic Violence
Dedicated page for defense before the Courts of Violence against Women:
Gender-Based Violence: What the Prosecution Must Prove (Art. 153 CP)
We offer specialized criminal defense in courts across Madrid and the rest of Spain. We handle each Gender Based Violence case with the urgency and technical rigor it requires from day one.
All pages in this practice area
Need urgent criminal defence?
Contact our specialist criminal defence lawyers. We evaluate your case confidentially.
Tools for your case
Do you need specialised legal assistance?
The judicial system is complex. We have the criminal-law specialisation and technical resources required to take on the defence.