Skip to content
AS
Alonso Sala
CRIMINAL LAWYERS
ES
Legal Analysis

Article 404 Spanish Criminal Code: Administrative Malfeasance (2026)

calendar_todayMay 20, 2026

Last updated:

lightbulbKey Takeaways

  • check_circleAn arbitrary decision issued knowingly
  • check_circleDisqualification only: 9 to 15 years
  • check_circleNot every illegality is malfeasance
  • check_circleKey: a reasonable legal interpretation

Quick answer

Article 404 of the Spanish Criminal Code punishes administrative malfeasance (prevaricación): the authority or public official who, knowing it to be unjust, issues an arbitrary decision in an administrative matter. Article 404 itself sets the penalty, which is solely special disqualification from public employment or office and from standing for election for 9 to 15 years; it carries no prison sentence. Not any illegality suffices: the Supreme Court requires the decision to be arbitrary, meaning its illegality is gross and cannot be explained by any reasonable interpretation of the law.

Need help with your case? Talk to a criminal defense lawyer at Alonso Sala.

Article 404 of the Spanish Criminal Code governs administrative malfeasance (prevaricación): the offence of a public official who knowingly issues an unjust decision. As criminal defence lawyers, we explain its scope.

What Article 404 Says

Malfeasance is committed by an authority or public official who, knowing it to be unjust, issues an arbitrary decision in an administrative matter. The penalty is special disqualification from public employment or office and from standing for election, for 9 to 15 years.

An Offence Without a Prison Sentence

Article 404 is unusual: it carries no prison sentence, only disqualification. The aim is to remove the official from public service rather than deprive them of liberty. This does not make it minor: disqualification of up to 15 years effectively ends a political or civil-service career.

What an "Arbitrary Decision" Means

Not every illegality is malfeasance. The Supreme Court requires the decision to be arbitrary — an illegality so gross and obvious that it cannot be explained by any reasonable interpretation of the law. It must also be a genuine decision, an administrative act with decision-making content, not a mere report or step.

Malfeasance by Omission

Malfeasance does not always consist in issuing an unjust decision. Case law has accepted malfeasance by omission where the official, having a legal duty to decide, deliberately fails to do so and that inaction is materially equivalent to an arbitrary decision (for instance, not deciding in order to let deadlines lapse and produce an effect favourable to a third party). Mere passivity or delay is not enough: a specific duty to decide and a conscious, unjust failure to act must be established.

When the Offence Becomes Time-Barred

Because Article 404 CP is punished with disqualification of up to 15 years, its maximum penalty is disqualification for more than ten years. Accordingly, under Article 131 CP, administrative malfeasance becomes time-barred after 15 years. The period runs from when the offence is committed; in continuing conduct, fixing the starting point (dies a quo) can become a significant defence issue.

Illegality is not malfeasance

An administrative act that the administrative courts may annul is not, in itself, a crime. Malfeasance requires a flagrant injustice issued with full knowledge.

Defence Strategies

  1. A reasonable legal interpretation: the decision, though debatable, was defensible in law.
  2. No "knowing" element: there was no knowledge of injustice, but error or a technical disagreement.
  3. The act is not a decision: it was a report, proposal or non-decisive step.
  4. Reliance on technical reports: the official followed the legal or technical services.
  5. Referral to administrative-court proceedings as the proper channel.

Being investigated for malfeasance?

The line between administrative illegality and crime is narrow. We defend authorities and officials.

📞 Call us: +34 91 078 65 74

⚖️ Need a criminal defence lawyer?

Specialist defence in malfeasance and crimes against the public administration.

→ Criminal defence: full legal information

Frequently asked questions

What does Article 404 of the Spanish Criminal Code say?expand_more

It punishes the authority or public official who, knowing it to be unjust, issues an arbitrary decision in an administrative matter. The penalty is special disqualification from public employment or office and from standing for election for 9 to 15 years.

Does malfeasance under Article 404 carry a prison sentence?expand_more

No. Article 404 CP provides only special disqualification of 9 to 15 years, with no prison sentence. The aim is to remove the official from public service. It is still a serious offence: disqualification of up to 15 years effectively ends a political or civil-service career.

What is an arbitrary decision for the purposes of Article 404?expand_more

Not every illegality is malfeasance. The Supreme Court requires the decision to be arbitrary: an illegality so gross and obvious that it cannot be explained by any reasonable interpretation of the law. It must also be a genuine decision — an administrative act with decision-making content, not a mere report or step.

When does the offence of administrative malfeasance become time-barred?expand_more

Because Article 404 CP is punished with disqualification of up to 15 years, its maximum penalty is disqualification for more than ten years, so the offence becomes time-barred after 15 years under Article 131 CP. The period starts to run from when the offence is committed.

Can malfeasance be committed by omission?expand_more

Beyond issuing an unjust decision, case law has accepted malfeasance by omission where the official, having a legal duty to decide, deliberately fails to do so and that inaction is materially equivalent to an arbitrary decision. It is a contested area that requires analysing the specific duty to decide case by case.

How is a malfeasance charge defended?expand_more

By showing that the decision rested on a reasonable legal interpretation, that there was no knowledge of injustice (no 'knowing' element), that the act was not a genuine decision, or that the official relied on prior technical or legal reports.

gavel

gavelDo you need criminal defense in this area?

We are criminal defense lawyers specializing in administrative prevarication. We act urgently to protect your rights.

View expertisearrow_forward

Related Articles

View allarrow_forward

Knowledge is power, but strategy is key.

What you read here is just the beginning. Transform information into active defense by contacting our team of experts.

call