Skip to content
Legal Analysis

Accused of Unfair Administration in Spain: What to Do

July 23, 2026Updated: 

Key Takeaways

  • Do not testify without a lawyer; gather minutes, powers of attorney and accounts
  • Art. 252 CP requires an excess of powers and harm
  • An unfortunate business decision is not, by itself, a crime
  • Many partner disputes are commercial, not criminal, matters

If reported for unfair administration, do not testify without a lawyer; gather the records justifying your decisions. Art. 252 CP punishes an administrator who, holding powers over another's assets, exceeds them and causes harm to those assets. A failed decision or partner dispute is not automatically a crime — often it is a civil or commercial matter. The defence shows you acted within your powers and caused no real harm.

Need help with your case? Talk to a criminal defence lawyer at Alonso Sala.

Being reported for unfair administration by a partner, the board or the company itself usually arises in the middle of a corporate dispute: a break-up between partners, a change of administrator or a disagreement over management. This guide is written from the perspective of the person accused: what to do in the first hours, when a management decision is genuinely a crime, and how the defence is built. For the detail of the offence itself, see also our guide to Art. 252 CP.

You Have Been Reported: What to Do First

The first steps shape everything that follows:

  • Do not testify without a lawyer. You have the right not to testify; explaining complex management decisions from memory can work against you.
  • Gather the corporate documentation: deeds, powers of attorney, board and shareholder meeting minutes, accounts, contracts and emails.
  • Document your powers: what you were entitled to do as administrator, within what limits, and how reasonable each decision was.
  • Do not make significant corporate decisions without advice while the matter is open.

What Art. 252 CP punishes

Unfair administration (Art. 252 CP) punishes anyone who, holding powers to administer another's assets — from the law, from an authority or from a legal transaction — exceeds those powers and causes harm to the assets under administration. It is an offence autonomous from misappropriation (Art. 253 CP): here the administrator abuses their powers without needing to keep the asset. It carries the same penalties as fraud.

The line with a commercial dispute

This is the heart of the defence. Most corporate disputes are resolved through the commercial courts — challenging resolutions, a corporate liability action, dissolution — and are not a crime. An unfortunate business decision, taken within the powers of the office and with the information available, does not become unfair administration merely because it caused losses. The offence requires an excess of powers and harm to the assets: without them, the matter belongs to the civil or commercial jurisdiction.

Overlap with corporate offences (Arts. 290-297 CP)

Unfair administration often appears alongside the corporate offences of Arts. 290 to 297 CP: falsifying the annual accounts (Art. 290), imposing or adopting abusive or harmful resolutions (Arts. 291 and 292), or denying a partner their rights (Art. 293). Several classifications may coexist in the same matter; working out which applies — or ruling them out — is an essential part of the defence work.

How a dismissal is achieved

When it is shown that you acted within your powers, that there was no significant excess, or that there was no real harm to the company's assets, the proceedings can be dismissed or redirected to the commercial courts, and an acquittal is possible at trial. An early defence that documents your powers and the reasonableness of your decisions is the best route to that outcome. Our firm handles criminal defence in corporate crimes and unfair administration.

Have you been reported for unfair administration?

Before you testify, tell us which decisions are being questioned. We review the powers of attorney, the minutes and the accounts to prepare your defence. Contact our corporate crimes lawyer.

📞 +34 910 786 574

Frequently asked questions

What should I do as soon as I learn of the report?

Do not testify without a lawyer, and gather all the corporate documentation: deeds, powers of attorney, board and shareholder meeting minutes, accounts, contracts and emails that explain and justify the decisions being questioned. Unfair administration is decided by the detail of the administrator's powers and the business reasonableness of each decision; organising that evidence as soon as possible is essential.

What does unfair administration punish?

Art. 252 CP punishes anyone who, holding powers to administer another's assets — arising from the law, entrusted by an authority or assumed through a legal transaction — exceeds those powers and thereby causes harm to the assets under administration. It is an offence autonomous from misappropriation: here the administrator abuses their powers without needing to keep the asset.

Is a dispute between partners always a crime?

No. Most corporate disputes — disagreements over strategy, over the distribution of profits or over management — are resolved through the commercial courts (challenging resolutions, liability actions, dissolution) and are not a crime. Unfair administration requires an excess of administrative powers and harm to the assets; an unfortunate business decision, taken within the powers of the office, is not a crime merely because it caused losses.

What are corporate offences?

These are the offences under Arts. 290 to 297 CP, which protect the company, its partners and third parties against conduct by administrators: falsifying the annual accounts or other documents (Art. 290), imposing or adopting abusive or harmful resolutions (Arts. 291 and 292), or denying a partner the exercise of their rights (Art. 293), among others. Unfair administration (Art. 252 CP) often overlaps with one of these offences in the same case.

Can the report be dismissed?

Yes. If you acted within your powers, if there was no significant excess, or if no real harm to the company's assets is proven, the proceedings can be dismissed or redirected to the commercial courts, and an acquittal is possible at trial. The line between a legitimate business decision and an abuse of powers is precisely where the defence is fought.

Do you need criminal defence in this area?

We are criminal defence lawyers specialising in corporate crimes. We act urgently to protect your rights.

View expertise

This page is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice: every case requires individual assessment. How this content is produced and verified: editorial policy.

Related Articles

View all

Before you act, speak to a criminal defence lawyer.

What you read here is just the beginning. Transform information into active defence by contacting our team of experts.