Skip to content

Prostitution & Sexual Exploitation: Criminal Defense

Criminal lawyers in procuring and prostitution exploitation

Procuring, or exploiting another person's prostitution, is defined in art. 187 CP: profiting from someone else's prostitution, even with their consent, carries 2 to 4 years' imprisonment plus a fine of 12 to 24 months (art. 187.1, second paragraph, CP), while compelling a person into prostitution through violence, intimidation or deception carries 2 to 5 years and the same fine (art. 187.1, first paragraph, CP). Voluntarily engaging in prostitution is not a crime in Spain, and neither is being a client of adult prostitution: the criminal boundary lies in exploitative profit and coercion. These cases are usually investigated as large multi-defendant proceedings, with wiretaps and asset seizure. At Alonso Sala, criminal defence lawyers with over 15 years of experience, we defend art. 187 CP charges before any court in Spain.

Prostitution & Sexual Exploitation: Regulation in Spain

The Spanish legal system articulates a partial abolitionist model regarding prostitution: it does not penalize voluntary prostitution among adults, but severely sanctions all forms of exploitation of others' prostitution (Art. 187 CP), minor prostitution (Art. 188 CP) and human trafficking for sexual exploitation (Art. 177 bis CP). The protected legal interest is sexual freedom and indemnity and, in trafficking scenarios, human dignity as essential nucleus recognized in Art. 10.1 of the Spanish Constitution and the Warsaw Convention (2005). Consolidated Supreme Court case-law has defined the typical contours: procuring does not require violence or coercion when there is lucrative exploitation, but penalties radically aggravate when such commissive means concur.

The conducts punished by Art. 187 CP are two, set out in the two paragraphs of section 1. Profiting from another's prostitution (Art. 187.1, second paragraph, CP) carries 2 to 4 years' imprisonment and a fine of 12 to 24 months for whoever profits by exploiting another person's prostitution, even if voluntary, where personal or economic vulnerability or onerous, disproportionate or abusive conditions concur. Coercive determination into prostitution (Art. 187.1, first paragraph, CP) carries 2 to 5 years' imprisonment and the same fine where an adult is determined to enter or remain in prostitution through violence, intimidation, deception or abuse of superiority, need or vulnerability. Premises provision —providing locales or establishments for others' prostitution in exchange for economic consideration— has generated intense jurisprudential controversy: the Supreme Court distinguishes between mere market-price rental (atypical) and facilitation with control over activity or charging disproportionate amounts (typical). Sex tourism, internet prostitution and social media recruitment are emerging modalities subject to specialized investigations.

The penalties reach extremely severe dimensions. Minor prostitution (Art. 188 CP) is punished with 2 to 5 years of prison; if the victim is under 16, 4 to 8 years; with aggravating factors (Art. 188.3 CP), up to 8 to 12 years. The solicitation of sexual services from minor or trafficking victim (Art. 188.4 CP, introduced by LO 1/2015) is an autonomous type applicable to the client who knows or should know the victim's condition. Human trafficking for sexual exploitation (Art. 177 bis CP) is the most serious offence in this sphere, with 5 to 8 years of prison in its basic form and up to 15 years or more with aggravating factors (criminal organization, special vulnerability, endangerment, minor victim). The forfeiture of profits, premises, vehicles and assets used applies under Art. 127 CP. Civil liability for moral and patrimonial damages can reach very high figures.

Technical defense is built on four axes. First, the absence of typical exploitation: the offence requires economic profit causally linked to the sexual activity of others; merely commercial relationships (market-price rentals without control, security services without imposing work conditions, transport without linkage to activity) are atypical. Second, accredited voluntariness of the prostitute: when the person engaged in prostitution freely, without coercion, deception or abuse of superiority, and no need situation or vulnerability exploited by the accused concurred, the simple modality of Art. 187.1.a CP fails. Third, dissociation of the accused from criminal organizations: in macro-proceedings with multiple defendants, individual membership or necessary cooperation must be proven; mere knowledge or tangential relationship does not integrate authorship. Fourth, the challenge of incriminating evidence: testimonies of protected witnesses without judicial ratification, telephone interventions with motivation defects, searches with procedural vices, are potential evidentiary nullities.

In current forensic practice, police operations on sexual exploitation and trafficking have intensified after the creation of UCRIF (Central Unit for Illegal Immigration Networks and Documentary Falsifications) of the National Police and the Central Trafficking Section of the Prosecutor's Office. Investigations habitually develop as macro-cases with multiple defendants, massive telephone interventions, simultaneous searches, precautionary asset forfeiture and pursuit of related money laundering. Organic Law 1/2025 on Justice Service Efficiency, Directive 2011/36/EU on trafficking and the Warsaw Convention configure a demanding legal framework. At Alonso Sala, our criminal lawyers specialized in prostitution exploitation intervene in these complex proceedings with a multidisciplinary team including specialists in economic criminal law (for laundering challenges), experts in international judicial cooperation (in transnational scenarios), and forensic experts in electronic communications. The procedural strategy is oriented to the individualized dissociation of the accused from exploitative activity, rigorous challenge of circumstantial evidence and articulation of technical defenses that precisely distinguish lawful activity from criminally relevant conduct.

Criminalized Conduct

Procuring (Art. 187.1, second paragraph)

Profiting from others' prostitution. 2-4 years' imprisonment + fine.

Forced Prostitution (Art. 187.1, first paragraph)

Determining an adult to enter or remain in prostitution through violence, intimidation or deception. 2-5 years' imprisonment + fine.

Minor Prostitution (Art. 188)

Inducing, promoting, favouring or facilitating the prostitution of a minor or a person with a disability, or profiting from it. 2-5 years' imprisonment; 4-8 years if the victim is under 16.

Premises Provision

Providing premises for prostitution. Punishability depends on degree of control.

Accused of prostitution exploitation?

The line between legal activity and punishable exploitation requires precise legal analysis.

Defense Strategies

1

Absence of Exploitation

Prove no profit from others' prostitution. Mere commercial relationship without control is not punishable.

2

Victim's Voluntariness

Prove alleged victims engaged voluntarily without coercion.

3

Organization Dissociation

In criminal organization cases, prove the accused was not part of the structure.

4

Lawful Income Proof

When money laundering is charged, prove lawful origin of funds through accounting.

Trafficking vs Procuring: Key Differences

Trafficking (Art. 177 bis CP)

  • Capture, transport, transfer, or reception of victim
  • Base penalty: 5-8 years
  • Frequent transnational component
  • Specially protected victims

Procuring (Art. 187 CP)

  • Profiting from others' prostitution
  • Base penalty: 2-4 years + fine
  • Generally national scope
  • Possible voluntariness of victim

Why Choose Us?

  • Experience in sexual exploitation and organized crime.
  • Deep knowledge of case law on premises provision.
  • Coordinated defense in multi-defendant proceedings.
  • Capability for complex financial investigations (related laundering).

FAQs: Prostitution Exploitation

Is prostitution a crime in Spain?
Voluntarily engaging in prostitution is NOT a crime. What IS a crime is exploiting others' prostitution: profiting from it, forcing someone into it, or deceptive recruitment.
What are the penalties for prostitution exploitation?
Profiting from another person's prostitution: 2 to 4 years' imprisonment and a fine of 12 to 24 months (art. 187.1, second paragraph, CP). Coercing an adult into prostitution through violence, intimidation or deception: 2 to 5 years and the same fine (art. 187.1, first paragraph, CP). Where the offender is a public authority or official, belongs to a criminal organisation or endangered the victim's life or health, those penalties are imposed in their upper half (art. 187.2 CP). If the victim is a minor or a person with a disability, art. 188 CP applies: 2 to 5 years, and 4 to 8 years if the victim is under 16.
What is the difference between procuring and human trafficking?
Procuring (Art. 187) focuses on profiting from others' prostitution. Trafficking (Art. 177 bis) is much more serious, involving capture, transport, and exploitation. Trafficking penalties: 5-8 years base, up to 15+ with aggravating factors.
Is it a crime to be a prostitution client in Spain?
No, being a client of adult voluntary prostitution is not a crime. However, soliciting services from a minor or trafficking victim IS a crime.
How much does a lawyer cost for a prostitution exploitation case?
There is no single fee: it depends on the procedural stage, the complexity of the case (the number of co-defendants and the volume of wiretap and financial evidence to challenge) and the court that will hear it. We set a fixed budget after studying the matter, so you know from the outset what to expect.
Do you act throughout Spain?
Yes. Although the firm is based in Madrid, we take on the defence before any court in the country.

This page is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice: every case requires individual assessment. How this content is produced and verified: editorial policy.

Do you need specialised legal assistance?

The judicial system is complex. We have the criminal-law specialisation and technical resources required to take on the defence.