
Criminal Lawyers in Preventive Criminal Counsel
Criminal risk management and early defence before legal contingencies. Due Diligence and asset protection.
Preventive criminal counsel is the branch of economic criminal law that anticipates judicial proceedings: it identifies, assesses and neutralises criminal risks before they materialise, drawing on criminal compliance as an exonerating mechanism (Article 31 bis CP), voluntary tax regularisation before any inspection notice (Article 305.4 CP), and mistake of law (Article 14.3 CP). It includes criminal due diligence in M&A transactions and documented decision-making protocols that can help show the director acted without intent. Our work, backed by more than 15 years of experience in economic criminal law, designs these advance defences knowing how these risks are attacked at trial, before any complaint or investigation exists.
Preventive Criminal Counsel: Concept, Modalities, Benefits and Strategy
Preventive criminal counsel is the branch of economic criminal law that anticipates judicial proceedings. Its purpose is to identify, assess and neutralize criminal risks before they materialize, sparing the client the traumatic experience of an investigation, a search or formal charges. The legal foundation rests on the principle of criminal legality (Art. 25 SC) and on statutory mechanisms such as criminal compliance as an exonerating mechanism (Art. 31 bis CP), voluntary tax regularization (Art. 305.4 CP) and error of prohibition (Art. 14.3 CP), all figures that gain meaning when activated before the procedure begins. In today's complex regulatory environment —DSA, MiCA, AML/CFT, NIS2, AI Act, GDPR, Act 2/2023 on whistleblowers—, prevention is not luxury but operational necessity.
The modalities of preventive counsel are numerous and adapt to each client profile. Criminal due diligence in M&A operations, IPOs, joint ventures and restructurings identifies hidden criminal contingencies (internal fraud, tax or environmental irregularities, labour violations, intellectual property issues or laundering risks) before deal closure. Voluntary tax regularization (Art. 305.4 CP) eliminates criminal liability for tax fraud when carried out before notification of the start of verification actions. Decision-making protocols with documented external advice can help rule out intent and prove the director's due diligence. Implementation of criminal compliance programs under Art. 31 bis CP and UNE 19601 enables future exoneration of the legal entity. Internal investigation evaluates detected irregularities before they escalate to the public sphere. Lawful asset protection through restructurings, matrimonial regimes, succession planning and D&O insurance shields the director's patrimony provided it is executed well in advance and does not seek to evade existing debts, a foreseeable attachment or the civil liability arising from an offence already committed, which would be fraudulent concealment of assets (Art. 257 CP).
The technical benefits are quantifiable. In economic terms, prevention is far more efficient than facing a criminal defence in a macro-case or the consequences of a forfeiture. In legal terms, well-executed prevention provides access to mitigating factors, even highly qualified ones (Arts. 21.4 and 21.5 CP), causes of exemption (Art. 31 bis CP, Art. 305.4 CP) or, simply, avoidance of the procedure. In reputational terms, prevention preserves the personal and corporate brand against the "media penalty", often more devastating than the formal penalty. In personal and family terms, it avoids the psychological wear, mobility restrictions and account freezes that a criminal procedure entails even without final conviction.
The preventive counsel strategy we apply at Alonso Sala articulates in four phases. First, risk diagnosis: exhaustive mapping of the client's business or personal activity, identification of potentially applicable criminal types (tax, labour, environmental, corporate, money laundering, personal data, intellectual property, cybersecurity), evaluation of documentary and process vulnerabilities. Second, remediation design: correction of detected irregularities, voluntary regularizations, adjustment of internal protocols, implementation of whistleblowing channels under Act 2/2023, specific training. Third, robust documentation of every action with exculpatory value (minutes, external reports, signed legal opinions, training records). Fourth, permanent monitoring: periodic review of the risk map, updating with each regulatory reform (Organic Law 1/2025, Act 2/2023, DSA Regulation, MiCA, AI Act) and response simulations for potential incidents.
In current forensic practice, preventive counsel has shifted from option to operational requirement for directors, businesspeople, liberal professionals (doctors, lawyers, architects, engineers), wealth managers, family offices and regulated companies (financial, healthcare, energy, defence, telecommunications). Organic Law 1/2025 on Justice Service Efficiency, Act 2/2023 on Whistleblower Protection, Organic Law 14/2022 reforming embezzlement and unfair administration, the EU Regulations DSA, DMA, MiCA, AI Act and NIS2, as well as consolidated Supreme Court case-law on compliance, regularization and mitigating factors, configure a regulatory framework in full transformation. At Alonso Sala, with more than 15 years of experience in economic criminal law, we approach preventive counsel from a forensic perspective: we design anticipated defences knowing how risks are attacked in court. We coordinate criminal lawyers, tax specialists, auditors, forensic accountants, IT specialists and reputational consultants on each case, configuring a multidisciplinary team adapted to the client's profile.
Our Defence Strategy
Criminal Due Diligence
Audit of criminal risks in company purchase operations.
Decision Protocols
Establishment of decision-making processes that help rule out intent.
Voluntary Regularization
Strategies to neutralize tax crime risk through spontaneous payment.
Lawful Asset Protection
Asset restructuring to avoid contagion risks, always within strict legality.
Economic Criminal Law in Spain: Tax Fraud, Money Laundering and Corporate Crimes
Economic criminal law encompasses the most severe financial penalties in the Spanish Criminal Code. Tax fraud over €120,000 (Art. 305 CP), money laundering (Art. 301 CP), and corporate crimes (Art. 290-297 CP) are complex offences where defence requires a combination of criminal law expertise and deep accounting/financial knowledge.
Penalty Comparison: Economic Offences
| Offence | Threshold | Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Fraud (Art. 305) | >€120,000 | 1 – 5 years + fine of 1x to 6x |
| Aggravated Tax Fraud | >€600,000 | 2 – 6 years |
| Money Laundering (Art. 301) | Any amount | 6 months – 6 years |
| Aggravated Laundering (Arts. 301.1 and 302.1) | Drug trafficking, corruption, organisation members or obliged entities | Upper half (up to 6 years); heads of the organisation, one degree higher (up to 9 years) |
| Corporate Crime (Art. 290) | Balance sheet falsification | 1 – 3 years |
| Punishable Insolvency (Art. 259) | Conduct in actual or imminent insolvency | 1 – 4 years |
Key Defence Strategies
Tax Regularization Defence (Art. 305.4 CP)
Acknowledge and pay the full tax debt before being notified of a tax audit or, failing that, before the prosecutor or state attorney files a complaint, and criminal liability is excluded. This is the most powerful complete defence in tax fraud cases.
Challenge the €120K Threshold
The tax authority's calculation method is often contestable. Independent forensic accounting can challenge the assessed figure below the criminal threshold.
Money Laundering 'Self-laundering' Issues
Spanish courts have debated whether the primary offender can also be convicted of laundering their own proceeds. Challenge the double jeopardy implications.
Corporate Crime: Harm to Company vs. Shareholders
Corporate crimes under Arts. 290-294 CP do not always require actual harm: falsifying accounts (Art. 290 CP) only requires that the falsification be capable of causing financial harm, and actual harm raises the penalty to the upper half. Showing that the falsification could not harm the company, its members or third parties rules out that offence.
Advanced Criminal Defence
Our firm approaches each procedure with rigorous evidentiary analysis and proactive defence strategy.
Need urgent criminal defence?
Contact our specialist criminal defence lawyers. We evaluate your case confidentially.
Tools for your case
We also serve
View all locations →This page is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice: every case requires individual assessment. How this content is produced and verified: editorial policy.
Do you need specialised legal assistance?
The judicial system is complex. We have the criminal-law specialisation and technical resources required to take on the defence.