Article 312 of the Criminal Code
TÍTULO XV — De los delitos contra los derechos de los trabajadores
Previous versions
History of reforms to this article, from oldest to most recent, as recorded in the BOE’s consolidated legislation.
Ley Orgánica 10/1995, de 23 de noviembre, del Código Penal.
In force from 24/05/1996 to 31/01/2000
Explanation and defense
What Article 312 of the Criminal Code punishes
Article 312 punishes the illegal trafficking of labour and labour exploitation through deceit, within the title dealing with offences against workers' rights. It defines two groups of conduct: first, illegally trafficking in labour, that is, brokering the hiring of workers outside legal channels, usually for the broker's profit; second, recruiting people or inducing them to leave their job through deceptive or false job offers or working conditions, and employing foreign nationals without a work permit under conditions that harm, remove or restrict the rights they would otherwise hold under the law, a collective agreement or their individual contract.
This offence protects workers' rights against fraudulent labour intermediation or the exploitation of people's need for work, and in practice often overlaps with related offences such as human trafficking for labour exploitation (Article 177 bis) when the severity of the coercion or deceit reaches that higher level.
Penalty
The penalty is two to five years in prison and a fine of six to twelve months, both for illegal labour trafficking and for deceptive recruitment or employing foreign nationals without a work permit under conditions harmful to their rights.
Common scenarios
This offence appears in unlicensed temporary staffing agencies or unauthorised intermediaries who place workers on construction sites, farms or in hospitality in exchange for undisclosed commissions; in recruiting foreign workers with promises of employment and housing that are never honoured, leaving them in a vulnerable position; and in systematically hiring foreign workers without a work permit, under working hours or pay far below the legal minimum, exploiting their irregular administrative status to discourage complaints.
Defense strategy
The defense should examine whether "illegal" intermediation in the strict sense truly occurred, or whether the matter is instead an irregular employment relationship that should only be sanctioned through administrative or labour channels, since not every irregularity in hiring foreign staff reaches criminal relevance. It is key to establish whether genuine deceit about the conditions offered actually occurred, distinguishing a later contractual breach —a labour-law matter— from initial deceit that vitiates the worker's consent from the outset. The boundary with human trafficking under Article 177 bis, which carries a markedly harsher penalty, must also be carefully assessed, along with whether the reported working conditions actually cross the threshold of harm, removal or restriction of rights the offence requires. Where several intermediaries were involved in placing the same worker, it is also worth mapping out exactly who negotiated the terms actually offered, since liability under Article 312 attaches to the person who made or knew of the deceptive offer, not automatically to every business further down the chain.
Quick reference
Orientative data computed from the highest prison term mentioned in this article. Aggravated or mitigated subtypes, non-custodial penalties and concurrence rules may alter the outcome in each specific case.
Highest prison term mentioned
5 years
Classification (arts. 13 & 33 CP)
Less serious offense
Limitation period (art. 131 CP)
5 years
Accused of an offense under article 312?
Our team regularly defends those accused under crimes against workers' rights. Technical strategy aimed at dismissal or acquittal when legally viable.