Skip to content
A

Alonso Sala

CRIMINAL LAWYERS

Computer Fraud Lawyer

Specialist criminal defense in computer fraud: system manipulation, phishing and non-consented transfers (Arts. 248-249 CP).

Computer fraud is the form of fraud committed without deceiving a person directly, by manipulating a computer system to obtain a non-consented asset transfer. It is governed by Articles 248 and 249 of the Spanish Penal Code, which equate to classic fraud the use of "some computer manipulation or similar artifice" that produces the displacement of an asset to another's detriment.

As criminal lawyers, we defend both people under investigation and victims seeking to recover what was defrauded. The boundary with technical cybercrime (illegal access or computer damage) matters: computer fraud protects property, not the integrity of systems.

Forms

  • Phishing and smishing: fraudulent capture of banking credentials by impersonating the bank, followed by unauthorized transfers.
  • Online banking manipulation: execution of payment orders or transfers by accessing the victim's account.
  • Unauthorized use of card data: purchases or charges using unlawfully obtained card numbers (physical use of forged cards overlaps with Art. 399 bis).
  • CEO fraud (BEC): false transfer orders impersonating an executive or a supplier.

Penalties & Aggravations

The basic offence carries 6 months to 3 years' imprisonment, set according to the amount defrauded and the means used. Where the amount does not exceed 400€, the conduct may be a minor offence punished with a fine. The aggravated subtypes of Article 250 —1 to 6 years and a fine— apply when the amount exceeds 50,000€, the conduct affects a plurality of people or a third party's identity is used.

Defense Strategy

  1. Challenging authorship: an IP, a device or a destination account do not by themselves prove who carried out the operation; we demand conclusive technical evidence.
  2. The "money mule" position: someone who merely lends an account may be unaware of the unlawful origin of the funds; we analyze intent and possible atypicality.
  3. Amount and unit of action: we discuss the aggregation of amounts and classification as a minor or continued offence.
  4. Bank liability: when defending the victim, we claim against the bank for its duties of diligence and strong authentication.
balance

Penalty Chart

Type / ScenarioCriminal Penalty
Basic offence (Arts. 248-249 CP)6 months to 3 years' imprisonment, depending on the amount and means used.
Minor offenceIf the amount does not exceed 400€, a fine (minor offence).
Aggravated (Art. 250 CP)1 to 6 years and a fine where the amount exceeds 50,000€, affects a plurality of people or a third party's identity is used.

* Penalties shown are indicative. The actual penalty depends on case circumstances, applicable mitigating and aggravating factors.

shield_lock

Our Defense Strategy

gavel01

Forensic IT Expert Report

Technical analysis of logs, devices and traceability to challenge attribution of the operation to the accused.

gavel02

Delimiting Intent

For fund receivers, establishing lack of knowledge of the unlawful origin to exclude fraud or downgrade the offence.

gavel03

Claim Against the Bank

For the victim, asserting the bank's liability for breaching its authentication and diligence duties.

Guide to Property Crimes in Spain: Defense Strategies

Property crimes (Crimes Against Assets) are regulated in Title XIII of the Spanish Criminal Code (Art. 234-304). These offenses range from petty theft to complex economic fraud, with penalties varying greatly depending on the amount involved, the method used, and any aggravating circumstances.

Key Distinctions: Theft, Robbery, and Fraud

OffenseArticleKey ElementBasic Penalty
Minor Theft (Hurto leve)Art. 234.2<400€, no forceFine 1-3 months
Theft (Hurto)Art. 234.1>400€, no force6 months – 18 months
Aggravated Theft (Art. 235)Art. 235Special items/multi-recidivist1 – 3 years
Robbery with ForceArt. 240Breaking in/tools1 – 3 years
Robbery with ViolenceArt. 242Direct threat/intimidation2 – 5 years
Fraud (Estafa)Art. 249Deception + financial harm6 months – 3 years

Main Defense Strategies in Property Crimes

Challenge the Animus Lucrandi

Demonstrate that the accused had no intent to profit — a valid defense in alleged theft cases.

Contest Valuation

Dispute how the value of the stolen item was assessed. Below €400 = minor offense with much lower penalties.

Prior Consent or Ownership Claim

In disputes between acquaintances, prove the accused believed they had a right to the item.

Recidivism Analysis

Many aggravated theft charges rely on prior criminal record. Challenge the computation of prior offenses.

Chain of Custody (Receiving Stolen Goods)

Challenge the prosecution's evidence that the accused knew the items were stolen.

Error of Type Defense (Fraud)

In commercial fraud cases, demonstrate that the accused genuinely believed their representations were true.

Critical: Time Limits for Evidence

In property crimes, digital evidence (CCTV footage, mobile location data) is often deleted within 30 days. Contacting a specialist lawyer immediately after arrest or charge is essential to preserve exculpatory evidence.

gavel

Why Choose Us?

Need a criminal defense lawyer for this type of offense? Here's how we work:

check
Proof of AuthorshipWe challenge technical attribution: an IP or a destination account does not by itself identify the material author of the transfer.
check
Intent AnalysisFor fund receivers ('money mules') we analyze actual knowledge of the unlawful origin, which may exclude fraudulent intent.
check
Amount & ClassificationWe review the aggregation of amounts to argue classification as a minor, continued or aggravated offence (Art. 250 CP).
workspace_premium
+15 Years of ExperienceTeam dedicated exclusively to criminal law before Spanish courts and tribunals.
support_agent
Direct AttentionYour case is handled directly by a senior lawyer of the firm.
Consult My Casearrow_forward

gavelElements of the Crime

  • check_circleComputer manipulation:Alteration of a system's operation or a similar artifice, not deception aimed at a person.
  • check_circleNon-consented transfer:Displacement of an asset without the owner's authorization.
  • check_circleIntent to profit and harm:Purpose of obtaining a benefit with corresponding harm to a third party.

gavelPenal Consequences

Basic offence (Arts. 248-249 CP)

6 months to 3 years' imprisonment, depending on the amount and means used.

Minor offence

If the amount does not exceed 400€, a fine (minor offence).

Aggravated (Art. 250 CP)

1 to 6 years and a fine where the amount exceeds 50,000€, affects a plurality of people or a third party's identity is used.

quiz

FAQs

What is computer fraud?expand_more
It is the form of fraud committed by manipulating a computer system to obtain a non-consented asset transfer, without directly deceiving a person. It is governed by Arts. 248-249 of the Spanish Penal Code.
What is the penalty for computer fraud?expand_more
The basic offence carries 6 months to 3 years' imprisonment depending on the amount. Up to 400€ it may be a minor offence with a fine. With amounts above 50,000€ or other Art. 250 aggravations, the penalty reaches 1 to 6 years.
Is phishing computer fraud?expand_more
Yes. The fraudulent capture of credentials and the subsequent unauthorized transfer fall within computer fraud, which often concurs with other cybercrimes.
Can I be convicted just on my IP address?expand_more
It should not be enough. An IP, a device or a destination account do not by themselves identify the author. The defense demands technical evidence conclusively linking the person to the operation.
I lent my account to receive a payment — am I liable?expand_more
It depends on your knowledge of the unlawful origin of the funds. The 'money mule' scenario requires analyzing intent; proven lack of knowledge may exclude fraud or downgrade the offence.
Is the bank liable if my account is emptied?expand_more
It may be. Payment-services rules impose strong authentication and diligence duties on banks; where these are not met, restitution of the defrauded amount can be claimed.
Can the mitigating factor of reparation apply?expand_more
Yes. Returning the defrauded amount before trial allows the mitigating factor of repairing the damage, with a relevant effect on the sentence.

Do you need specialised legal assistance?

The judicial system is complex. We have the criminal-law specialisation and technical resources required to take on the defence.

Contact Alonso Sala
call