Skip to content
A

Alonso Sala

CRIMINAL LAWYERS

Forgery of Identity Documents (ID Card and Passport)

Criminal defence in the forgery and use of the ID card, passport, driving licence and foreigner ID as official documents (Art. 392 CC).

Forgery of identity documents is one of the most frequent forms of document forgery. The national ID card, passport, driving licence and foreigner ID have the status of official documents, so their forgery by a private individual is penalised under Article 392 of the Criminal Code. At Alonso Sala, as criminal defence lawyers specialising in document forgery, we take on the defence of those investigated for forging or using these documents.

The protected legal interest is public faith and the security of legal transactions: society's confidence that these documents faithfully identify their holder. Identity forgery is usually instrumental to other ends, which gives rise to significant concurrences of offences.

Identity Documents as Official Documents

Because of their official character, the forgery of these documents by a private individual is punished with imprisonment of 6 months to 3 years and a fine of 6 to 12 months (Art. 392 CC). The following are included:

  • National ID card: The official identification document par excellence.
  • Passport: An international travel document with reinforced security features.
  • Driving licence: An official document authorising the holder to drive.
  • Foreigner ID number: The identification document for foreign nationals.

Use of a Forged Identity Document

The Criminal Code punishes not only the person who manufactures the document, but also whoever uses it knowing it to be forged. Under Articles 393 and 396 CC, whoever uses a forged identity document knowing it to be forged, without having taken part in the forgery, faces a lower penalty than that provided for the forger.

The essential requirement is knowledge of the forgery: whoever presents a document genuinely believing it to be authentic commits no offence. In addition, the forgery must be suitable to deceive: a crude imitation, easily detectable, may fall outside the offence for lacking any capacity to induce error in commerce.

Concurrence with Usurpation and Immigration

The forgery of identity documents gives rise to relevant concurrences with other figures:

  • Usurpation of civil status (Art. 401 CC): Where, beyond forging the document, the identity of a real person is impersonated by assuming their legal position, the offence of usurpation of civil status may concur.
  • Immigration offences: The use of forged identity documents to facilitate irregular entry or stay may concur with immigration offences.
  • Fraud (Art. 248 CC): If the false identity is used as deception to obtain a financial benefit, it concurs with fraud.

Defence Strategy

  1. Unsuitability to deceive: Demonstrate that the document was so crude that it lacked any capacity to induce error.
  2. Lack of knowledge of the forgery: Establish that the accused was unaware the document was forged when presenting it (Arts. 393 and 396 CC).
  3. Absence of real impersonation: Distinguish mere forgery from usurpation of civil status, which requires impersonating an existing person.
  4. Delimitation of concurrence: Challenge the undue accumulation of charges where the forgery is a means to another offence.
balance

Penalty Chart

Type / ScenarioCriminal Penalty
Forgery by a private individual (Art. 392 CC)Imprisonment of 6 months to 3 years and a fine of 6 to 12 months for forging an official identity document.
Knowing use (Arts. 393 and 396 CC)Lower penalty than that for the forger for whoever uses a forged identity document knowing it to be forged.
Usurpation of civil status (Art. 401 CC)Possible concurrence where, in addition to forging, the identity of a real person is impersonated by assuming their legal position.

* Penalties shown are indicative. The actual penalty depends on case circumstances, applicable mitigating and aggravating factors.

shield_lock

Our Defense Strategy

gavel01

Exclusion for Unsuitability

Establish through expert evidence that the document lacked the minimum security features to pass as genuine.

gavel02

Mistake as to Authenticity

Prove that the accused genuinely believed the document was legitimate when presenting it, which excludes intent.

gavel03

Delimitation from Usurpation

Distinguish forgery of the document from the impersonation of a real person required by Article 401 CC.

Document Forgery, False Testimony & Digital Crimes in Spain

Document forgery (Art. 390-399 CP), false testimony (Art. 458-462 CP), and cybercrime (Art. 197-197 bis CP) are legal areas where technical evidence — forensic document analysis, digital trails, and expert testimony — dominates the trial. As criminal defense lawyers specializing in these offenses, we counter each piece of forensic evidence with our own expert analysis.

Penalty Table: Documentary and Informational Offenses

OffenseArticlePenalty
Public Document ForgeryArt. 3903 – 6 years + disqualification
Commercial Document ForgeryArt. 3926 months – 3 years
Private Document ForgeryArt. 3956 months – 2 years
Use of False DocumentArt. 400Same as the forgery committed
False Testimony (Criminal)Art. 4581 – 3 years + fine
False AccusationArt. 4566 months – 2 years
Computer Intrusion (Hacking)Art. 197.36 months – 2 years
gavel

Why Choose Us?

Need a criminal defense lawyer for this type of offense? Here's how we work:

check
Unsuitability to DeceiveWe demonstrate that the identity document was so crude that it lacked any capacity to induce error in commerce.
check
Lack of Knowledge of the ForgeryWe establish that the accused was unaware the document was forged when presenting it (Arts. 393 and 396 CC).
check
Absence of Real ImpersonationWe distinguish mere document forgery from usurpation of civil status, which requires impersonating an existing person.
workspace_premium
+15 Years of ExperienceTeam dedicated exclusively to criminal law before Spanish courts and tribunals.
support_agent
Direct AttentionYour case is handled directly by a senior lawyer of the firm.
Consult My Casearrow_forward

gavelElements of the Crime

  • check_circleMaterial object:ID card, passport, driving licence and foreigner ID, which have the status of official documents.
  • check_circleConduct:Forging the identity document or using it knowing it to be forged without having taken part in the forgery.
  • check_circleSuitability to deceive:The forgery must be capable of inducing error. A crude imitation may fall outside the offence for unsuitability.

gavelPenal Consequences

Forgery by a private individual (Art. 392 CC)

Imprisonment of 6 months to 3 years and a fine of 6 to 12 months for forging an official identity document.

Knowing use (Arts. 393 and 396 CC)

Lower penalty than that for the forger for whoever uses a forged identity document knowing it to be forged.

Usurpation of civil status (Art. 401 CC)

Possible concurrence where, in addition to forging, the identity of a real person is impersonated by assuming their legal position.

quiz

FAQs

Is forging the ID card an offence?expand_more
Yes. The ID card is an official document. Its forgery by a private individual is punished under Article 392 CC with imprisonment of 6 months to 3 years and a fine of 6 to 12 months.
Are the passport and driving licence also official documents?expand_more
Yes. The passport, driving licence and foreigner ID have the status of official documents, so their forgery is governed by Article 392 CC.
What is the penalty for using a forged ID card I did not manufacture?expand_more
Knowingly using a forged identity document, without having taken part in its forgery, is punished with a lower penalty than that for the forger (Arts. 393 and 396 CC).
Do I have to know the document is forged?expand_more
Yes. The offence requires knowing conduct. Whoever presents a document genuinely believing it to be authentic commits no offence of using a forged document.
What is the difference between forging the ID card and usurping civil status?expand_more
Forging the ID card alters the document; usurpation of civil status (Art. 401 CC) requires impersonating a real person, assuming their legal position in a comprehensive way.
Can it concur with immigration offences?expand_more
Yes. The use of forged identity documents to facilitate irregular entry or stay may concur with immigration offences.
Does the quality of the forgery matter?expand_more
Yes. The forgery must be suitable to deceive. A crude imitation, easily detectable, may fall outside the offence for lacking any capacity to induce error.
What happens if I use a forged ID card to open an account and defraud?expand_more
The forgery or use of the document may concur with fraud under Article 248 CC if the false identity serves as deception to obtain an unlawful financial benefit.

Do you need specialised legal assistance?

The judicial system is complex. We have the criminal-law specialisation and technical resources required to take on the defence.

Contact Alonso Sala
call