The Anti-Abuse Electronic Tag: How It Works and Breaches (2026)
Last updated:
listIn this article
lightbulbKey Takeaways
- check_circleMonitors compliance with the restraining order
- check_circleBreaching it is an offence under Art. 468
- check_circleTampering with the device is also a breach
- check_circleDefence: technical faults and chance encounters
The anti-abuse electronic tag — the common name for telematic monitoring devices — verifies compliance with restraining orders in gender-violence cases. As criminal lawyers, we explain how it works and its criminal risks.
What It Is and How It Works
The system combines a device carried by the person under the order and another carried by the victim. The technology verifies in real time that the person does not come within the prohibited distance set by the restraining order. If the perimeter is breached, an alert is generated to the monitoring services.
The Breach
Failing to comply with the measure monitored by the tag amounts to an offence of breaching an order (Art. 468 of the Criminal Code). A breach includes:
- Coming closer to the victim than the set distance.
- Tampering with or disabling the device.
- Deliberately neglecting the charging or upkeep of the device.
⚠️ The victim's consent does not exempt
Even if the victim consents to the approach, the majority case law holds that breaching the measure remains an offence. The measure is imposed by the court, not the victim.
The Defence Against a Breach
- Technical faults of the device: false positives, loss of coverage or geolocation errors.
- Chance, unavoidable encounters, where the person moves away immediately.
- The absence of intent in charging or configuration problems.
Are you charged with a breach?
We analyse the device data and whether there was genuine intent in the approach.
📞 Call us: +34 91 078 65 74
⚖️ Need a criminal lawyer?
Criminal defence in breach of sentences and interim measures.