DUI Defence (Art. 379 CP): Breathalyzer & Licence
Last updated:
listIn this article
lightbulbKey Takeaways
- check_circleCriminal: ≥0.60 mg/l breath
- check_circleLicence loss 1-4 years
- check_circleCalibration + error margin
- check_circleRefusing = greater penalty
Driving with a blood alcohol concentration above the legal limit is one of the most common offences in Spain and, when it crosses the threshold of Art. 379 of the Spanish Criminal Code, it stops being an administrative fine and becomes a criminal road-safety offence. As criminal lawyers specialised in DUI defence, in this article we explain the applicable thresholds, the real consequences and the most effective technical defence lines for challenging the breathalyzer evidence.
Administrative vs. Criminal Thresholds
The distinction is decisive: it marks the difference between a traffic fine and a criminal record:
- Administrative track (General Traffic Regulation): Sanction from 0.25 mg/l of breath alcohol (0.5 g/l in blood). Fine and licence-points loss, no criminal record.
- Criminal track (Art. 379.2 CP): Offence from 0.60 mg/l of breath alcohol (1.2 g/l in blood), regardless of the actual driving.
- Driving under the influence (Art. 379.2 CP, first sentence): Even below 0.60 mg/l, an offence exists if it can be shown that alcohol was actually impairing the driving (zigzag, sudden braking, evident drowsiness).
⚠️ Professional and Novice Drivers
For professional drivers and novices (<2 years licence), the administrative thresholds are stricter (0.15 mg/l). The criminal threshold remains the general one (0.60 mg/l), but a conviction can carry additional consequences in case of job loss.
Penalties and Real Consequences
Art. 379.2 CP punishes driving with criminal blood-alcohol levels with one or several of the following alternative penalties:
- Imprisonment of 3 to 6 months.
- Fine of 6 to 12 months (daily quotas between €2 and €400).
- Community service of 31 to 90 days.
- In all cases: deprivation of the right to drive motor vehicles for 1 to 4 years.
While imprisonment is usually suspended for first-time offenders, the licence deprivation is unavoidable and, if it exceeds 2 years, entails definitive loss of the licence: to drive again, you must take the exam again (Art. 47 CP).
Defence Lines: Challenging the Breathalyzer
The breathalyzer is a measuring instrument subject to a strict metrological control regime. Every procedural or technical defect is a defence avenue:
1. Expired or missing calibration. Each breathalyzer must undergo periodic metrological inspections (annual or after a certain number of measurements). We always request the current certificate. Expired calibration nullifies measurement reliability.
2. Margin of error and tolerance zone. The metrological regulation recognises a margin of error of ±5% for evidential breathalyzers. If the result is in the borderline zone (e.g. 0.62 mg/l), applying the margin places the driver below the criminal threshold. The defence invokes this as reasonable doubt.
3. Missing second mandatory measurement. The protocol requires two measurements separated by at least 10 minutes. If only one was done, or the interval was not respected, the evidence can be challenged.
4. Broken chain of custody. The denunciation report must identify the breathalyzer by its serial number, record the exact time and the driver's signature. Formal errors (e.g. missing serial number) are frequent and useful.
5. Right to a blood counter-analysis. The driver may request a hospital blood test. If the Civil Guard did not inform him of this right, the evidence can be declared null due to a violation of the right to defence.
💡 Common Case
Driver with a result of 0.61 mg/l: the difference with the criminal threshold (0.60) is below the metrological margin of error. The defence invokes the in dubio pro reo principle and the offence is reclassified as an administrative sanction.
Refusing to Blow: More Serious Than the Positive
Refusing to take the breathalyzer test is a standalone offence typified in Art. 383 CP, with penalties of imprisonment from 6 months to 1 year and licence deprivation of 1 to 4 years. The penalty is higher than that of Art. 379 CP, so refusing is never advisable: even if the result is positive, technical breathalyzer defence is viable, while refusal turns the case into an almost certain conviction.
Alternatives to Trial: Plea Bargain and Substitution
Where the evidence is solid, mechanisms exist to minimise the impact:
- Plea bargain with one-third reduction in rapid trial (Art. 801 LECrim): reduces the penalty, avoids delay and allows negotiation of the exact licence-deprivation duration.
- Substitution of imprisonment with fine or community service: for sentences under 1 year for first-time offenders.
- Conditional suspension with road safety course: avoids prison entry in exchange for fulfilling conditions (Art. 80 CP).
Tested positive? Act in the first 24h.
The rapid trial is held within days. Technical review of the breathalyzer and assessment of the alternatives requires a criminal lawyer from the very first moment.
📞 Call us: +34 91 078 65 74
gavelDo you need criminal defense in this area?
We are criminal defense lawyers specializing in dui / drunk driving. We act urgently to protect your rights.