When Can a Company Director Go to Prison in Spain?
In this article
Key Takeaways
- Director Criminal Liability
- Art. 31 CP
- most-common-crimes-for-directors
- how-compliance-protects-directors
Yes. A director is personally liable for the offences they commit or take part in, and Art. 31 CP also makes them answer for special offences whose required status (e.g. being the taxpayer) lies with the company. The most common are unfair administration (Art. 252 CP), accounting fraud (Art. 290), tax fraud (Art. 305) and money laundering (Art. 301). Liability is never presumed from the title alone.
Need help with your case? Talk to a criminal defence lawyer at Alonso Sala.
One of the most frequent questions we receive from business owners and executives is: can a company director go to prison? The answer is unequivocally yes. Since the 2010 and 2015 reforms of the Spanish Criminal Code, company directors face significant personal criminal exposure.
The Legal Framework
Art. 31 CP establishes that whoever acts as a de facto or de jure administrator of a legal entity is personally liable even if the conditions, qualities or relationships that the offence requires of its author (for example, being the taxpayer or the debtor) are met not by them personally but by the company. Beyond those special offences, a director is liable, like anyone else, for the offences they commit or take part in. This means that corporate structure does not insulate directors from criminal prosecution. The company itself may also be prosecuted in parallel under Art. 31 bis CP (only for offences in its catalogue), but neither route excludes the other: the individual director and the legal entity answer separately.
De Facto and De Jure Directors
Art. 31 CP deliberately covers both the de jure director — the person formally appointed and registered — and the de facto director: whoever actually takes the management decisions, even without holding any formal title. Resigning from the board or placing a frontman in the registry therefore does not remove criminal exposure if the person continues to run the company in practice. Conversely, a purely formal director who never intervened in the decision under scrutiny has a solid line of defence, because criminal liability is personal and cannot be presumed from the title alone.
Most Common Crimes for Directors
- Unfair administration (Art. 252 CP): Breaching the powers to manage the company's assets by exceeding them and thereby harming those assets. Fraud penalties: 6 months to 3 years; 1 to 6 years over €50,000; 4 to 8 years over €250,000.
- Accounting fraud (Art. 290 CP): Falsifying annual accounts or other documents reflecting the company's legal or financial position, in a way capable of causing harm. Penalty 1-3 years and a fine of 6-12 months.
- Tax fraud (Art. 305 CP): Defrauding the Tax Authority of over €120,000 in tax per tax period. Penalty 1-5 years and a fine of one to six times the amount.
- Money laundering (Art. 301 CP): Using company structures to launder criminal proceeds. 6 months to 6 years and a fine of one to three times the value of the assets.
How Compliance Protects Directors
Art. 31 bis CP allows the company (not its directors) to be exempt from criminal liability if, before the offence, it had adopted and effectively implemented an adequate compliance programme and the other statutory conditions are met. A programme that is just a document collecting dust does not qualify. For the director, compliance is not a defence in itself, but a genuine control system can help show that they met their supervisory duties (relevant where liability by omission is alleged, Art. 11 CP).
Defence Strategies for Directors
- Attacking the subjective element: the prosecution must prove that the director knew of and willed the unlawful conduct; a poor business decision, by itself, is not a crime.
- Personal non-intervention: identifying who actually adopted the decision within the company, since liability cannot be attributed collectively to the whole board.
- Real economic rationale: in unfair administration cases (Art. 252 CP), showing that the transaction had a genuine business justification and was not a disposal against the company's interest.
- Effective compliance: documenting that the programme contemplated by Art. 31 bis CP was actually implemented and supervised, and that the offence required circumventing its controls.
What to Do if You Are Under Investigation
These proceedings usually begin with a long investigation phase in which the accounting and corporate documentation of the company is examined. The statement of the director as a suspect is a decisive moment and should never be faced without having studied the case file beforehand. An early, well-documented technical defence — expert accounting reports, board minutes showing how the decision was actually taken, and evidence of the compliance programme in operation — frequently makes the difference between the case being dismissed during the investigation and the director sitting through a trial. The earlier that material is gathered, the more credible it is.
Need a criminal defence lawyer?
If you are facing a criminal matter, our team of specialist defence lawyers can help. Contact us for a case assessment.
Official text: article 31 of the Spanish Criminal Code (BOE)
Frequently asked questions
Can a company director in Spain be sent to prison for the company's actions?
Yes — a director is personally liable for the offences they commit or take part in while in office (also by omission where they had a duty to prevent them: Art. 11 CP), and Art. 31 CP makes them answer for special offences whose required status lies with the company, even where the company itself is also prosecuted separately under Art. 31 bis CP (only for offences in its catalogue).
Does resigning or using a frontman remove a director's criminal exposure?
No — liability extends to the de facto director, meaning whoever actually makes the management decisions, regardless of whether they are formally registered; someone who continues running the company in practice remains exposed even after resigning on paper.
What are the most common offences directors are prosecuted for?
Unfair administration (Art. 252 CP, with the fraud penalties: 6 months to 3 years, 1 to 6 years over €50,000 and 4 to 8 years over €250,000), accounting fraud (Art. 290 CP, 1-3 years and a fine of 6-12 months), tax fraud (Art. 305 CP, 1-5 years' imprisonment and a fine of one to six times the amount, for tax evaded over €120,000 per tax period) and money laundering (Art. 301 CP, 6 months to 6 years and a fine of one to three times the value of the assets).
Is being the formally registered director enough to be convicted?
No — criminal liability is personal and cannot be presumed from the title alone; a purely formal director who never intervened in the decision under scrutiny has a solid defence, since the prosecution must prove the director actually knew of and willed the unlawful conduct.
Can a compliance programme protect a director from liability?
Only indirectly — the Art. 31 bis CP exemption benefits the company, not its directors, and requires a model adopted and effectively implemented before the offence. For a director, a genuine control system is not a defence in itself, but it can help show that they met their supervisory duties (relevant if charged by omission, Art. 11 CP).
What should a director do if placed under investigation?
Avoid giving a statement before the case file has been studied, and gather expert accounting reports, board minutes showing how decisions were actually made, and evidence of the compliance programme's real operation as early as possible.
Do you need criminal defence in this area?
We are criminal defence lawyers specialising in admin criminal liability. We act urgently to protect your rights.
This page is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice: every case requires individual assessment. How this content is produced and verified: editorial policy.