Criminal Lawyers for Receiving Stolen Vehicles and Parts
Defense against accusations of trading stolen vehicles or parts of unlawful origin.
Last updated:
Receiving stolen vehicles and parts is the acquisition or trading of cars, motorcycles or components that come from a prior theft, knowing their unlawful origin (Art. 298 CP). It is a sophisticated activity that frequently relies on the manipulation of the vehicle's identifiers, which is why it often concurs with document forgery.
Vehicle Traffic
A stolen vehicle is re-introduced into legal traffic by altering its identity: cloned or duplicated number plates, the tampering of the VIN (chassis number) and the use of documentation from another, written-off vehicle ("doubling"). Many of these vehicles are also exported abroad to break the trail. Because falsifying the identifiers is itself an offence, this conduct typically concurs with document forgery, with penalties that add up; identifying who altered the identity and who merely traded the vehicle is, therefore, decisive.
Reused Parts
An alternative to selling the whole vehicle is its dismantling for parts (despiece): the stolen vehicle is broken down and its components —engines, doors, electronics, catalytic converters— are sold separately. Loose parts are far harder to trace than a complete vehicle, which makes this modality attractive to the receiver. The defence examines whether the specific part could reasonably be identified as being of unlawful origin and whether the operator complied with the registry of incoming material.
Legal Defense
The defence centres on rebutting the knowledge of the unlawful origin. The main lines are: a good-faith purchase supported by documentation (transfer, technical inspection record, the seller's identification); the absence of indicators that should have aroused suspicion (a market-consistent price, coherent paperwork); and the clear separation between the receiving offence (Art. 298 CP) and both the underlying theft and any forgery of the identifiers, in which the client did not participate. The basic form carries prison of 6 months to 2 years and a fine, rising for habitual activity.
Penalty Chart
| Type / Scenario | Criminal Penalty |
|---|---|
| Principal Penalty | Penalty established by the Criminal Code for vehicle & parts receiving. |
| Fines and Ancillary Penalties | Fines and special disqualification linked to Vehicle & Parts Receiving. |
| Civil Liability | Compensation to victims for damages and losses caused. |
* Penalties shown are indicative. The actual penalty depends on case circumstances, applicable mitigating and aggravating factors.
Our Defense Strategy
Error on Origin
Demonstrating that the origin seemed lawful given the circumstances.
Guide to Property Crimes in Spain: Defense Strategies
Property crimes (Crimes Against Assets) are regulated in Title XIII of the Spanish Criminal Code (Art. 234-304). These offenses range from petty theft to complex economic fraud, with penalties varying greatly depending on the amount involved, the method used, and any aggravating circumstances.
Key Distinctions: Theft, Robbery, and Fraud
| Offense | Article | Key Element | Basic Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minor Theft (Hurto leve) | Art. 234.2 | <400€, no force | Fine 1-3 months |
| Theft (Hurto) | Art. 234.1 | >400€, no force | 6 months – 18 months |
| Aggravated Theft (Art. 235) | Art. 235 | Special items/multi-recidivist | 1 – 3 years |
| Robbery with Force | Art. 240 | Breaking in/tools | 1 – 3 years |
| Robbery with Violence | Art. 242 | Direct threat/intimidation | 2 – 5 years |
| Fraud (Estafa) | Art. 249 | Deception + financial harm | 6 months – 3 years |
Main Defense Strategies in Property Crimes
Challenge the Animus Lucrandi
Demonstrate that the accused had no intent to profit — a valid defense in alleged theft cases.
Contest Valuation
Dispute how the value of the stolen item was assessed. Below €400 = minor offense with much lower penalties.
Prior Consent or Ownership Claim
In disputes between acquaintances, prove the accused believed they had a right to the item.
Recidivism Analysis
Many aggravated theft charges rely on prior criminal record. Challenge the computation of prior offenses.
Chain of Custody (Receiving Stolen Goods)
Challenge the prosecution's evidence that the accused knew the items were stolen.
Error of Type Defense (Fraud)
In commercial fraud cases, demonstrate that the accused genuinely believed their representations were true.
Critical: Time Limits for Evidence
In property crimes, digital evidence (CCTV footage, mobile location data) is often deleted within 30 days. Contacting a specialist lawyer immediately after arrest or charge is essential to preserve exculpatory evidence.
Why Choose Us?
Need a criminal defense lawyer for this type of offense? Here's how we work:
Do you need specialised legal assistance?
The judicial system is complex. We have the criminal-law specialisation and technical resources required to take on the defence.