
Sports Doping Defense Lawyers
Art. 362 quinquies CP. Criminal defense for doctors, coaches, and trainers
Last updated:
Sports Doping: Criminal Type, Penalties and Dual Criminal-Sports Strategy (Art. 362 quinquies CP)
Sports doping is a relatively new criminal offence introduced into the Spanish Criminal Code by Organic Law 7/2006 and refined by Organic Law 4/2010, today located in Article 362 quinquies CP within Chapter III of Title XVII on public-health offences. The protected legal interest is twofold: on the one hand, the physical integrity of the athlete exposed to harmful substances; on the other, the integrity of sporting competition as a culturally and economically relevant public-interest activity. The provision punishes whoever, without therapeutic justification, "prescribes, provides, dispenses, supplies, administers, offers or facilitates" to federated competitive, non-competitive or amateur athletes substances or methods not regulatorily allowed aimed at enhancing physical capacities or altering competition results. Supreme Court case-law stresses that the consuming athlete is not an active subject: only those who supply the substance are.
The methods of commission cover the entire doping-support chain. Criminally punishable conducts include prescription by sports physicians (convictions of cycling medical teams in Operación Puerto and later cases are the benchmark), dispensation by a pharmacist aware of the doping purpose, supply by physical trainers or coaches, direct administration by healthcare personnel, and offering or facilitation by intermediaries, distributors or specialised websites. The substances and methods covered are listed annually by WADA and transposed into Spanish law by Resolution of the Higher Sports Council: anabolics (testosterone, nandrolone, stanozolol), erythropoietin (EPO), human growth hormone (hGH), beta-2 agonists, masking diuretics, autologous transfusions and, in recent years, gene doping and hormonal modulators. Organic Law 11/2021 on the fight against doping in sport, replacing LO 3/2013, has updated the infringement catalogue and harmonised the framework with the WADA World Anti-Doping Code.
The penalties under Art. 362 quinquies CP are prison from 6 months to 2 years, fine from 6 to 18 months and special disqualification from public office, profession or trade, from 2 to 5 years. The penalty rises to its upper half when an aggravating circumstance applies (supply to a minor under 18, commission within an organisation dedicated to these conducts, use of fraudulent means to introduce substances into competitive sport). Criminal sanction is fully compatible with the sports sanction imposed by the Spanish Agency for Health Protection in Sport (AEPSAD) under LO 11/2021: 2 to 4 years' suspension (with multipliers up to lifetime for recidivism), result disqualification, prize return, federative licence withdrawal and, where applicable, exclusion from public funding. A therapeutic use exemption (AUT/TUE), validly granted before use, excludes both criminal and sports liability for the authorised substance.
The technical defence strategy requires acting simultaneously on three levels. On the criminal level, the most fruitful lines are: (i) absence of intent of the prescribing physician when the substance had a proven therapeutic purpose and the TUE was being processed; (ii) challenge to the chain of custody of biological samples (urine and blood), analysing the ISO 17025 protocols of the accredited laboratory and the WADA Quality Control certificates; (iii) evidentiary nullity of searches, phone tapping or inspections of sports facilities carried out without a reasoned judicial warrant; (iv) atypicality due to insufficient evidence on the doping purpose of the substance, required beyond mere possession. On the administrative-sports level, we articulate appeals before the Administrative Sports Tribunal (TAD) and, where appropriate, the contentious-administrative jurisdiction. On the international level, we file arbitrations before the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS/TAS) in Lausanne, the ultimate review forum for sanctions imposed by international federations and WADA.
In current forensic practice we see sustained growth in proceedings in disciplines traditionally outside the anti-doping spotlight: amateur fitness and bodybuilding (SARMs and peptides traded via digital platforms), endurance (amateur cycling, trail running, triathlon), martial arts and esports (use of stimulants and nootropics). The Guardia Civil's Central Operative Unit (UCO) and the Central Intelligence Brigade have intensified investigations into clinics, gyms and online suppliers, and Organic Law 1/2025 on Justice Service Efficiency has modified deadlines and digitalisation. At Alonso Sala we act for sports physicians, coaches, physical trainers, physiotherapists, pharmacists and athletes involved in doping investigations, deploying a coordinated criminal, administrative and sports defence with technical knowledge of WADA protocols, official listings and CAS jurisprudence, essential to avoid both criminal conviction and the sports suspension that ruins a professional career.
Administrative vs. Criminal Track
sports_scoreSports Sanction
- sportsAEPSAD / WADA
- sports2-4 year suspension
- sportsResult disqualification
- sportsPrize return
- sportsAffects the ATHLETE
gavelCriminal Offense
- gavelArt. 362 quinquies CP
- gavel6 months - 2 years prison
- gavelFine and seizure
- gavelProfessional disqualification
- gavelAffects the ENTOURAGE (doctor, coach)
Charged with Sports Doping?
Whether through criminal prosecution or sports sanctions, having a lawyer who knows both proceedings is indispensable.
hubDrug Crime Specializations
General Trafficking (Art. 368)
Defense in basic type: cultivation, production, or trafficking. Technical differentiation between substances causing serious harm and those that do not.
Criminal Organization
Defense in macro-cases with multiple accused. Challenging hierarchical structure and membership charges. Art. 570 bis CP.
International Trafficking
Import/export, containers, and National Court jurisdiction. Transnational criminal law. Art. 370 CP.
Cannabis Cultivation
Self-consumption doctrine, indoor/outdoor plantations, electricity fraud, and home search nullity.
Cannabis Clubs
Legal defense of associations and clubs. Limits of shared consumption and Supreme Court doctrine.
Sports Doping
Criminal and disciplinary defense in sports doping. Art. 362 quinquies CP. Prohibited substances and anti-doping controls.
Drug Crimes in Spain: Defence Guide for Trafficking, Possession and Cannabis Clubs
Drug offences are among the most prosecuted crimes in Spain. Articles 368-378 of the Criminal Code distinguish between drugs that cause serious harm to health (cocaine, heroin, amphetamines) and those of lesser harm (cannabis, MDMA). This distinction is pivotal — it directly determines the minimum and maximum prison sentences applicable.
Penalty Table: Drug Offences
| Offence | Article | Substance type | Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic drug trafficking | Art. 368 | Serious harm (cocaine) | 3 – 6 years |
| Basic drug trafficking | Art. 368 | Lesser harm (cannabis) | 1 – 3 years |
| Aggravated trafficking (Art. 369) | Art. 369 | Large amounts/minors | 4.5 – 9 / 1.5 – 4.5 years |
| Criminal organisation (Art. 369 bis) | Art. 369 bis | Organised crime | 9 – 12 years |
| International trafficking (Art. 370) | Art. 370 | Cross-border/large scale | Upper half of applicable range |
| Personal possession (own use) | Not criminal | Personal amounts | Administrative fine only |
Key Defence Strategies
Own-Use Defence (Art. 368 CP)
If the quantity found corresponds to personal consumption patterns and there are no aggravating signs (scales, bags, large amounts of cash), the defence argues the substance was for personal use — not a criminal offence.
Cannabis Social Club Defence
Legally constituted cannabis clubs do not constitute drug trafficking if: membership is adult-only, closed distribution, no profit, no promotion, and quantities correspond to established consumption levels.
Challenging the 'Large Amount' Threshold
The threshold for 'large amount' (notoria importancia) is fixed by case law, not statute. Precise weighing with deduction of adulterants can bring quantities below the threshold.
Breaking the Chain of Custody
Drug evidence is often challenged on chain of custody grounds. Procedural irregularities in seizure, sealing, transfer or analysis can invalidate the forensic evidence.
Criminal Organization: Proving Role
Being part of an organisation requires stable, hierarchical structure. Sporadic cooperation or a minor role (driver, lookout) does not automatically trigger Art. 369 bis penalties.
Controlled Delivery and Police Provocation
Evidence obtained through unlawful police provocation (agent provocateur) is inadmissible. Distinguish between undercover infiltration (lawful) and provocation of an offence that would not otherwise occur.
Specific Mitigating Factors in Drug Offences
Addiction (Art. 21.2 CP)
Proven drug dependence can operate as mitigating (simple), highly qualified mitigating, or even incomplete defence, significantly reducing the penalty. Requires psychological and medical expert reports demonstrating that the addiction affected the offender's ability to understand the unlawfulness of their conduct.
Active Collaboration (Art. 376 CP)
Provides a 1-2 degree penalty reduction for the informant who supplies effective evidence to identify other suspects or dismantle the organisation. The information must be NEW, VERIFIABLE, and USEFUL. Strategic assessment is crucial before cooperating.
Shared Consumption Doctrine
The Supreme Court has defined 5 cumulative requirements: habitual identified consumers, closed premises, moderate quantity for immediate use, simultaneous consumption, and absence of profit. Failure of any one requirement converts the conduct into trafficking.
'Notoria Importancia' Thresholds by Substance
| Substance | Threshold (Pure) | Gross equivalent (approx.) | Penalty impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cocaine | 750 g pure | ~3–5 kg gross | 6–9 years |
| Heroin | 300 g pure | ~1–2 kg gross | 6–9 years |
| Hashish | 2,500 g THC | ~10 kg material | 1.5–4.5 years |
| MDMA | 240 g pure | ~720 pills | 6–9 years |
| Amphetamine | 90 g pure | ~300 g gross | 6–9 years |
| Methamphetamine | 15 g pure | ~30 g gross | 6–9 years |
Key Supreme Court Rulings
The Supreme Court confirms that cannabis clubs are lawful if they are genuinely closed associations, membership is strictly adult, no promotion is carried out beyond the membership, and quantities do not exceed personal consumption patterns. Any failure of these conditions may constitute drug trafficking.
The 'large amount' threshold must be calculated on the pure substance after subtracting adulterants and impurities. Gross weight is not the correct measurement. The defence should always request an independent quantitative analysis.
If police provocation created the intent to commit the offence (the accused would not have acted without the provocation), evidence is excluded under Art. 11.1 LOPJ. Mere opportunity provided by an undercover officer does not amount to provocation.
From Arrest to Trial: Key Procedural Stages
Arrest & Police Custody
Maximum 72 hours. Right to a lawyer and to remain silent. Never testify without your lawyer present.
Court Hearing (Art. 505 LECrim)
Within 72 hours. Judge decide: release, bail, or pretrial detention. Critical hearing for drug trafficking cases.
Investigation Phase
Analysis of evidence, expert reports (toxicology, purity). Period to challenge wiretaps and searches. Duration: 6-18 months.
Interim Order / Indictment
Prosecution formalises charges. Defense may request dismissal or downgrading of charges.
Oral Hearing
Trial before Provincial Court (basic trafficking) or National Court (organisation/international). Duration: 1 day to several months in macro-cases.
FAQs: Sports Doping
Is sports doping a criminal offense?expand_more
What's the difference between sports sanctions and criminal charges?expand_more
What substances are prohibited?expand_more
Can the athlete be criminally convicted?expand_more
Do Therapeutic Use Exemptions (TUEs) exempt from liability?expand_more
Who investigates doping offenses?expand_more
Is self-administering doping substances a crime?expand_more
Do you need specialised legal assistance?
The judicial system is complex. We have the criminal-law specialisation and technical resources required to take on the defence.