Skip to content
Alonso Sala
CRIMINAL LAWYERS

Sports Doping Defense Lawyers

Art. 362 quinquies CP. Criminal defense for doctors, coaches, and trainers

The offence of sports doping (Article 362 quinquies of the Spanish Criminal Code (CP)) punishes anyone who prescribes, provides, dispenses, supplies, administers or offers athletes prohibited substances or methods capable of enhancing their performance and endangering their health. It is punished with imprisonment of 6 months to 2 years, a fine of 6 to 18 months, and special disqualification from the profession or trade for 2 to 5 years; the penalty is aggravated if the victim is a minor or deception is used. The athlete who dopes is not criminally liable, only disciplinarily. At Alonso Sala we work on authorised therapeutic use, the absence of any doping intent, and irregularities in the chain of custody of the samples.

Sports Doping: Criminal Type, Penalties and Dual Criminal-Sports Strategy (Art. 362 quinquies CP)

Sports doping is a relatively new criminal offence: it was introduced into the Spanish Criminal Code by Organic Law 7/2006, which added Art. 361 bis CP, and was relocated and refined by Organic Law 1/2015, which moved it to Article 362 quinquies CP, today within Chapter III of Title XVII on public-health offences. The protected legal interest is twofold: on the one hand, the physical integrity of the athlete exposed to harmful substances; on the other, the integrity of sporting competition as a culturally and economically relevant public-interest activity. The provision punishes whoever, without therapeutic justification, "prescribes, provides, dispenses, supplies, administers, offers or facilitates" to federated competitive, non-competitive or amateur athletes substances or methods not regulatorily allowed aimed at enhancing physical capacities or altering competition results. Supreme Court case-law stresses that the consuming athlete is not an active subject: only those who supply the substance are.

The methods of commission cover the entire doping-support chain. Criminally punishable conducts include prescription by the sports physician or by a doctor embedded in a club's or team's technical staff, dispensation by a pharmacist aware of the doping purpose, supply by physical trainers or coaches, direct administration by healthcare personnel, and offering or facilitation by intermediaries, distributors or specialised websites. The substances and methods covered are listed annually by WADA and transposed into Spanish law by Resolution of the Higher Sports Council: anabolics (testosterone, nandrolone, stanozolol), erythropoietin (EPO), human growth hormone (hGH), beta-2 agonists, masking diuretics, autologous transfusions and, in recent years, gene doping and hormonal modulators. Organic Law 11/2021 on the fight against doping in sport, replacing LO 3/2013, has updated the infringement catalogue and harmonised the framework with the WADA World Anti-Doping Code.

The penalties under Art. 362 quinquies CP are prison from 6 months to 2 years, fine from 6 to 18 months and special disqualification from public office, profession or trade, from 2 to 5 years. The penalty rises to its upper half when an aggravating circumstance applies (supply to a minor under 18, commission within an organisation dedicated to these conducts, use of fraudulent means to introduce substances into competitive sport). Criminal sanction is fully compatible with the sports sanction imposed by the Spanish Agency for Health Protection in Sport (AEPSAD) under LO 11/2021: 2 to 4 years' suspension (with multipliers up to lifetime for recidivism), result disqualification, prize return, federative licence withdrawal and, where applicable, exclusion from public funding. A therapeutic use exemption (AUT/TUE), validly granted before use, excludes both criminal and sports liability for the authorised substance.

The technical defence strategy requires acting simultaneously on three levels. On the criminal level, the most fruitful lines are: (i) absence of intent of the prescribing physician when the substance had a proven therapeutic purpose and the TUE was being processed; (ii) challenge to the chain of custody of biological samples (urine and blood), analysing the ISO 17025 protocols of the accredited laboratory and the WADA Quality Control certificates; (iii) evidentiary nullity of searches, phone tapping or inspections of sports facilities carried out without a reasoned judicial warrant; (iv) atypicality due to insufficient evidence on the doping purpose of the substance, required beyond mere possession. On the administrative-sports level, we articulate appeals before the Administrative Sports Tribunal (TAD) and, where appropriate, the contentious-administrative jurisdiction. On the international level, we file arbitrations before the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS/TAS) in Lausanne, the ultimate review forum for sanctions imposed by international federations and WADA.

In current forensic practice we see sustained growth in proceedings in disciplines traditionally outside the anti-doping spotlight: amateur fitness and bodybuilding (SARMs and peptides traded via digital platforms), endurance (amateur cycling, trail running, triathlon), martial arts and esports (use of stimulants and nootropics). The Guardia Civil's Central Operative Unit (UCO) and the Central Intelligence Brigade have intensified investigations into clinics, gyms and online suppliers, and Organic Law 1/2025 on Justice Service Efficiency has modified deadlines and digitalisation. At Alonso Sala we act for sports physicians, coaches, physical trainers, physiotherapists, pharmacists and athletes involved in doping investigations, deploying a coordinated criminal, administrative and sports defence with technical knowledge of WADA protocols, official listings and CAS jurisprudence, essential to avoid both criminal conviction and the sports suspension that ruins a professional career.

Administrative vs. Criminal Track

Sports Sanction

  • AEPSAD / WADA
  • 2-4 year suspension
  • Result disqualification
  • Prize return
  • Affects the ATHLETE

Criminal Offense

  • Art. 362 quinquies CP
  • 6 months - 2 years prison
  • Fine and seizure
  • Professional disqualification
  • Affects the ENTOURAGE (doctor, coach)

Charged with Sports Doping?

Whether through criminal prosecution or sports sanctions, having a lawyer who knows both proceedings is indispensable.

Drug Crime Specializations

Drug Crimes in Spain: Defence Guide for Trafficking, Possession and Cannabis Clubs

Drug offences are among the most prosecuted crimes in Spain. Articles 368-378 of the Criminal Code distinguish between drugs that cause serious harm to health (cocaine, heroin, amphetamines) and those of lesser harm (cannabis, MDMA). This distinction is pivotal — it directly determines the minimum and maximum prison sentences applicable.

Penalty Table: Drug Offences

OffenceArticleSubstance typePenalty
Basic drug traffickingArt. 368Serious harm (cocaine)3 – 6 years
Basic drug traffickingArt. 368Lesser harm (cannabis)1 – 3 years
Aggravated trafficking (Art. 369)Art. 369Large amounts/minorsNext higher degree: 6 – 9 years (serious harm) / 3 years and 1 day – 4 years and 6 months (lesser harm)
Criminal organisation (Art. 369 bis)Art. 369 bisOrganised crime9 – 12 years (serious harm) / 4 years and 6 months – 10 years (lesser harm); next higher degree for leaders, managers or administrators
Extreme gravity (Art. 370)Art. 370Extreme gravity, use of minors, organisation leadersPenalty of Art. 368 raised by one or two degrees — up to 13 years and 6 months for serious-harm substances
Personal possession (own use)Not criminalPersonal amountsAdministrative fine only

Key Defence Strategies

Own-Use Defence (Art. 368 CP)

If the quantity found corresponds to personal consumption patterns and there are no aggravating signs (scales, bags, large amounts of cash), the defence argues the substance was for personal use — not a criminal offence.

Cannabis Social Club Defence

Legally constituted cannabis clubs do not constitute drug trafficking if: membership is adult-only, closed distribution, no profit, no promotion, and quantities correspond to established consumption levels.

Challenging the 'Large Amount' Threshold

The threshold for 'large amount' (notoria importancia) is fixed by case law, not statute. Precise weighing with deduction of adulterants can bring quantities below the threshold.

Breaking the Chain of Custody

Drug evidence is often challenged on chain of custody grounds. Procedural irregularities in seizure, sealing, transfer or analysis can invalidate the forensic evidence.

Criminal Organization: Proving Role

Being part of an organisation requires stable, hierarchical structure. Sporadic cooperation or a minor role (driver, lookout) does not automatically trigger Art. 369 bis penalties.

Controlled Delivery and Police Provocation

Evidence obtained through unlawful police provocation (agent provocateur) is inadmissible. Distinguish between undercover infiltration (lawful) and provocation of an offence that would not otherwise occur.

Specific Mitigating Factors in Drug Offences

Addiction (Art. 21.2 CP)

Proven drug dependence can operate as mitigating (simple), highly qualified mitigating, or even incomplete defence, significantly reducing the penalty. Requires psychological and medical expert reports demonstrating that the addiction affected the offender's ability to understand the unlawfulness of their conduct.

Active Collaboration (Art. 376 CP)

Provides a 1-2 degree penalty reduction for the informant who supplies effective evidence to identify other suspects or dismantle the organisation. The information must be NEW, VERIFIABLE, and USEFUL. Strategic assessment is crucial before cooperating.

Shared Consumption Doctrine

The Supreme Court has defined 5 cumulative requirements: habitual identified consumers, closed premises, moderate quantity for immediate use, simultaneous consumption, and absence of profit. Failure of any one requirement converts the conduct into trafficking.

'Notoria Importancia' Thresholds by Substance

SubstanceThreshold (Pure)Gross equivalent (approx.)Penalty impact
Cocaine750 g pure~3–5 kg gross6–9 years
Heroin300 g pure~1–2 kg gross6–9 years
Hashish2,500 g THC~10 kg material1.5–4.5 years
MDMA240 g pure~720 pills6–9 years
Amphetamine90 g pure~300 g gross6–9 years
Methamphetamine15 g pure~30 g gross6–9 years

Key Supreme Court Rulings

Supreme Court doctrineCannabis clubs: legal requirements and limits

The Supreme Court confirms that cannabis clubs are lawful if they are genuinely closed associations, membership is strictly adult, no promotion is carried out beyond the membership, and quantities do not exceed personal consumption patterns. Any failure of these conditions may constitute drug trafficking.

Supreme Court doctrineNotoria importancia: threshold calculation method

The 'large amount' threshold must be calculated on the pure substance after subtracting adulterants and impurities. Gross weight is not the correct measurement. The defence should always request an independent quantitative analysis.

Supreme Court doctrineAgent provocateur: limits of undercover operations

If police provocation created the intent to commit the offence (the accused would not have acted without the provocation), evidence is excluded under Art. 11.1 LOPJ. Mere opportunity provided by an undercover officer does not amount to provocation.

From Arrest to Trial: Key Procedural Stages

1

Arrest & Police Custody

Maximum 72 hours. Right to a lawyer and to remain silent. Never testify without your lawyer present.

2

Court Hearing (Art. 505 LECrim)

Within 72 hours. Judge decide: release, bail, or pretrial detention. Critical hearing for drug trafficking cases.

3

Investigation Phase

Analysis of evidence, expert reports (toxicology, purity). Period to challenge wiretaps and searches. Duration: 6-18 months.

4

Interim Order / Indictment

Prosecution formalises charges. Defense may request dismissal or downgrading of charges.

5

Oral Hearing

Trial before Provincial Court (basic trafficking) or National Court (organisation/international). Duration: 1 day to several months in macro-cases.

FAQs: Sports Doping

Is sports doping a criminal offense?
Yes, since 2006. Art. 362 quinquies CP punishes with 6 months to 2 years imprisonment anyone who prescribes, supplies, facilitates, or distributes doping substances or methods. The athlete who dopes does NOT commit a crime; those who provide the substance do.
What's the difference between sports sanctions and criminal charges?
Sports sanctions (AEPSAD, WADA) are administrative: suspension, disqualification, prize return. Criminal offense (Art. 362 quinquies) affects the athlete's entourage: doctors, coaches, trainers. Both can be imposed simultaneously.
What substances are prohibited?
WADA's annually updated lists: anabolic steroids, EPO, growth hormone, beta-2 agonists, diuretics, and even methods like blood transfusions or gene doping.
Can the athlete be criminally convicted?
An athlete who consumes for themselves does NOT commit a criminal offense. But if they distribute to other athletes or promote doping in teams, they can be convicted as perpetrator or cooperator.
Do Therapeutic Use Exemptions (TUEs) exempt from liability?
A valid TUE excludes both the sports sanction and criminal offense for that specific substance. But it must be requested BEFORE use. A retroactive TUE is suspicious.
Who investigates doping offenses?
AEPSAD for the administrative track. Guardia Civil (UCSP) and National Police for criminal prosecution. CAS/TAS for international appeals.
Is self-administering doping substances a crime?
Yes, if it involves distribution to others. Buying EPO to inject yourself is a sports sanction but not criminal. Buying EPO and supplying it to teammates IS a criminal offense.

Need urgent criminal defence?

Contact our specialist criminal defence lawyers. We evaluate your case confidentially.

Do you need specialised legal assistance?

The judicial system is complex. We have the criminal-law specialisation and technical resources required to take on the defence.