Crimes by Public Officials
Comprehensive defense for officials accused of bribery, embezzlement, prevarication and abuse of authority.
Last updated:
Crimes by public officials comprise a set of criminal offenses that punish abuse, infidelity or breach of duties in the exercise of public functions. Regulated in Title XIX of the Spanish Criminal Code (Articles 404-445), they protect the proper functioning of Public Administration and citizen trust in institutions.
Criminal Law Concept of Public Official
Article 24.2 of the Criminal Code defines a public official as anyone who, by direct provision of law, election or appointment by competent authority, participates in the exercise of public functions. This concept is broader than the administrative definition and includes: career civil servants, public employees, elected officials (council members, members of congress, senators), procurement committee members, notaries, registrars, and anyone who de facto exercises public functions.
Main Criminal Offenses
The most frequent offenses in this area include:
- Administrative prevarication (Art. 404 CP): Issuing an arbitrary resolution knowing it to be unjust. Penalty: special disqualification 9-15 years.
- Abandonment of office and failure to prosecute crimes (Arts. 407-408 CP): Penalty: fine or suspension from employment.
- Disobedience and denial of assistance (Arts. 410-412 CP): Refusing to comply with a judicial order or provide required assistance.
- Infidelity in document custody (Arts. 413-415 CP): Destroying, concealing or stealing entrusted documents. Penalty: 1-4 years imprisonment.
- Disclosure of secrets (Art. 417 CP): Revealing secrets known by reason of the office. Penalty: 2-4 years imprisonment.
- Bribery (Arts. 419-427 CP): Soliciting or receiving gifts in exchange for official acts. Penalty: 2-6 years imprisonment.
- Influence peddling (Arts. 428-431 CP): Influencing an official by exploiting one's position. Penalty: 6 months-2 years.
- Embezzlement (Arts. 432-435 CP): Applying public funds to unauthorized purposes. Penalty: 2-6 years imprisonment.
Jurisdiction and Forum Privileges
Many of these offenses carry special forum privileges (aforamiento): offenses by senior officials (ministers, secretaries of state) are investigated by the Supreme Court; those by regional officials by the High Court of Justice. Forum privileges condition the entire defense strategy from the outset.
Penalty Chart
| Type / Scenario | Criminal Penalty |
|---|---|
| Prevarication (Art. 404) | Special disqualification 9-15 years and fine of 12-24 months. |
| Passive bribery (Art. 419) | Imprisonment 3-6 years, fine up to triple the amount and disqualification 7-12 years. |
| Embezzlement (Art. 432) | Imprisonment 2-6 years and absolute disqualification 6-10 years. |
| Disclosure of secrets (Art. 417) | Imprisonment 2-4 years, fine 12-18 months and disqualification 3-5 years. |
* Penalties shown are indicative. The actual penalty depends on case circumstances, applicable mitigating and aggravating factors.
Our Defense Strategy
Atypical Conduct
Demonstrate that the official's actions fell within legitimate administrative discretion, without constituting arbitrariness.
Absence of Intent
Prove that the official acted under mistake of fact or in the reasonable belief of acting lawfully.
Due Obedience
Argue that the official acted in compliance with superior orders, provided they did not constitute manifest violations.
Statute of Limitations
Exhaustive analysis of limitation periods and jurisdictional competence derived from the special forum of the office.
Crimes Against Public Administration in Spain: Bribery, Embezzlement and Abuse of Office — Defence Guide
Crimes against public administration (Arts. 404-445 CP) cover a broad spectrum of conduct by public officials and private individuals who offer or receive undue advantages. These are among the most complex prosecutions in Spain, typically involving parallel administrative, civil and criminal proceedings, as well as extensive financial investigations and asset recovery orders.
Penalty Table: Crimes Against Public Administration
| Offence | Article | Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Malfeasance / Abuse of Office | Art. 404 | 1 – 7 years disqualification |
| Embezzlement (malversation) | Art. 432 | 2 – 6 years + disqualification |
| Active bribery (giving) | Art. 424 | Fine 12-24 months |
| Passive bribery (serious official act) | Art. 419 | 2 – 6 years + disqualification |
| Influence peddling | Art. 428 | 6 months – 2 years + fine |
| Unlawful disclosure of official secrets | Art. 417 | 1 – 4 years + disqualification |
Key Defence Strategies
Malfeasance: Challenging the 'Unjust' Element
Malfeasance (Art. 404) requires the official's resolution to be 'manifestly unjust' (arbitrary). Decisions made within the margin of administrative discretion, even if wrong, do not constitute malfeasance — only a manifestly illegal decision without any legal basis does.
Bribery: The Agreement vs Gift Distinction
Passive bribery requires a specific corrupt agreement between the official and the payer before or during the official act. Subsequent gifts or gratifications, while ethically wrong, may fall outside the bribery offence and constitute a different, lesser crime.
Embezzlement: Temporary Use vs Appropriation
The offence requires a definitive appropriation or diversion of public funds for private benefit. Temporary use followed by full restitution, while disciplinarily sanctionable, may not satisfy the criminal standard for embezzlement.
Parallel Administrative Proceedings: ne bis in idem
If administrative sanction proceedings for the same conduct have already concluded with final punishment, the principle of ne bis in idem may prevent subsequent criminal prosecution for the same facts.
Why Choose Us?
Need a criminal defense lawyer for this type of offense? Here's how we work:
Do you need specialised legal assistance?
The judicial system is complex. We have the criminal-law specialisation and technical resources required to take on the defence.