Skip to content
AS
Alonso Sala
CRIMINAL LAWYERS
ES
Legal Analysis

How to Defend Yourself Against Fraud Charges: Complete Guide

calendar_todayMarch 22, 2026

Last updated:

lightbulbKey Takeaways

  • check_circleExplainer video 6:30
  • check_circleAntecedent vs subsequent intent
  • check_circlePenalties from 6 months to 8 years
  • check_circleDamage repair = mitigating factor

Quick answer

Fraud (Art. 248 CP) requires sufficient deceit — capable of deceiving a person of average diligence — an intent to profit and, above all, antecedent intent: the intention to deceive must exist before receiving the money. The decisive question in most cases is distinguishing the offence from a mere civil debt: if the intention not to perform arises afterwards (subsequent intent), there is no fraud, but a civil insolvency that is not criminally punishable. The defence relies on criminal atypicality, the victim's duty of self-protection and repair of the harm as a highly qualified mitigating factor.

Need help with your case? Talk to a criminal defense lawyer at Alonso Sala.

Have you been accused of fraud or received a court summons? In this video, the criminal lawyers at Alonso & Sala (Madrid) explain the keys to defending yourself against a fraud charge (Art. 248 of the Spanish Criminal Code, CP).

Are You Being Accused of Fraud? Understanding It Is Your Defense

When you receive a court summons for fraud, the first impulse is panic. But the reality is that not every accusation succeeds. Thousands of cases are dismissed or end in acquittal because the prosecution cannot prove the essential elements of the offense. Knowing those elements is your best weapon.

Fraud Offense: Article 248 of the Spanish Criminal Code

Art. 248 CP defines fraud as the use of "sufficient deception" to mislead another person, causing them to perform an act of disposing of assets to their own or another person's detriment, with intent to profit. Three key elements:

  • Sufficient deception: Not every lie amounts to fraud. The deception must be capable of misleading a person of average diligence.
  • Antecedent intent: The intention to deceive must exist BEFORE receiving the money. If the intention not to pay arises later, there is no fraud.
  • Intent to profit: There must be an intention to obtain an unlawful benefit.

Crime or Civil Debt? The Key Battle

This is the decisive question in most of the fraud cases we defend. Thousands of businesses fail every year, leaving unpaid debts behind. That is NOT fraud, it is civil insolvency. For there to be a criminal offense, the prosecution must prove the antecedent intent: that the defendant already knew, before signing the contract, that they were not going to fulfil it.

Subsequent intent (deciding not to pay later because of supervening financial difficulties) is not criminally punishable. Our job is to reconstruct the chronology to show that the initial will was to comply.

The Penalties: When They Are Aggravated

The penalties vary significantly depending on the amount and the circumstances:

  • Basic fraud (over EUR 400): 6 months to 3 years in prison.
  • Aggravated fraud (over EUR 50,000): 1 to 6 years in prison.
  • Highly aggravated fraud (over EUR 250,000): 4 to 8 years in prison.

Aggravating circumstances include: abuse of personal relationships, harm to essential goods (the family home), procedural fraud and multi-recidivism.

The Three Pillars of the Defense

At our firm we deploy a defense strategy based on three pillars:

  1. Criminal atypicality: Showing that there was no prior deception and steering the case back to the civil courts.
  2. Victim's own error: A defense based on the duty of self-protection. If the victim did not carry out the minimum checks that could be expected, the deception may not be "sufficient".
  3. Reparation of damage: Depositing the amount claimed with the court before trial so as to obtain a highly qualified mitigating factor, reducing the penalty by one or two degrees.

Mistakes You Must NOT Make

  • Making a statement without a lawyer: your police statement can be used against you. Exercise your right to remain silent.
  • Destroying evidence: This is an additional offense and raises suspicion of guilt.
  • Contacting the victim: It can be interpreted as intimidation or threats.
  • Ignoring the court summons: It can lead to an arrest warrant.

Returning the Money Can Reduce the Sentence

Reparation of damage is an extremely powerful tool in property offenses. It does not imply admitting guilt, but if there is a conviction, the penalty is reduced drastically. This is what we call "consignación ad cautelam": depositing the amount claimed with the court as insurance against a possible adverse ruling.

Accused of Fraud? Act Now

Every day you spend without preparing your defense is a day the prosecution uses to strengthen its case. Our specialist criminal fraud lawyers analyse your situation from the very first minute.

Call us: 91 078 65 74

Need a criminal defense lawyer?

If you are facing a criminal matter, our team of specialist lawyers can help you. Contact us for a case evaluation.

Frequently asked questions

What elements does the offence of fraud require?expand_more

Art. 248 CP requires three elements: sufficient deceit, capable of inducing error in a person of average diligence; antecedent intent, meaning the intention to deceive exists before receiving the money; and the intent to profit, the intention to obtain an unlawful benefit.

When is an unpaid debt fraud and when is it a civil matter?expand_more

This is the decisive question. For there to be an offence, the prosecution must prove antecedent intent: that the accused already knew, before signing the contract, that they would not perform. If the decision not to pay arises afterwards due to supervening financial problems (subsequent intent), there is no fraud, but a civil insolvency that is not criminally punishable.

What are the pillars of the defence against a fraud charge?expand_more

Three: criminal atypicality, showing there was no prior deceit and steering the case to the civil courts; the victim's error, based on the duty of self-protection where they failed to carry out the minimum required checks; and repair of the harm, by depositing the claimed amount with the court before the trial.

Does returning the money reduce the sentence for fraud?expand_more

Yes. Repair of the harm is a powerful tool in property offences: it does not imply admitting guilt, but if there is a conviction the sentence is reduced, and it can operate as a highly qualified mitigating factor lowering the penalty by one or two degrees. It is arranged by depositing the claimed amount with the court before the trial.

What mistakes should I avoid if accused of fraud?expand_more

Do not give a statement without a lawyer, as a police statement can be used against you; do not destroy evidence, which is an additional offence; do not contact the victim, as it may be interpreted as intimidation or threats; and do not ignore the court summons, which may lead to an arrest warrant.

warning

gavelDo you need criminal defense in this area?

We are criminal defense lawyers specializing in fraud (scams). We act urgently to protect your rights.

View expertisearrow_forward

Related Articles

View allarrow_forward

Knowledge is power, but strategy is key.

What you read here is just the beginning. Transform information into active defense by contacting our team of experts.

call