How to Defend Yourself Against Fraud Charges: Complete Guide
In this article
Key Takeaways
- Crime vs civil debt
- Antecedent vs subsequent intent
- Penalties from 6 months to 8 years
- Damage repair = mitigating factor
Fraud (Art. 248 CP) requires sufficient deceit — capable of deceiving a person of average diligence — an intent to profit and, above all, antecedent intent: the intention to deceive must exist before receiving the money. The decisive question in most cases is distinguishing the offence from a mere civil debt: if the intention not to perform arises afterwards (subsequent intent), there is no fraud, but a civil insolvency that is not criminally punishable. The defence relies on criminal atypicality, the victim's duty of self-protection and repair of the harm as a highly qualified mitigating factor. Anyone under investigation, whether the accusation is framed as fraud or as a scam, should instruct a fraud lawyer in Spain before making any statement.
Need help with your case? Talk to a criminal defense lawyer at Alonso Sala.
Have you been accused of fraud or received a court summons? In this guide, the criminal lawyers at Alonso & Sala (Madrid) explain the keys to defending yourself against a fraud charge (Art. 248 of the Spanish Criminal Code, CP).
Are You Being Accused of Fraud? Understanding It Is Your Defence
When you receive a court summons for fraud, the first impulse is panic. But the reality is that not every accusation succeeds. Thousands of cases are dismissed or end in acquittal because the prosecution cannot prove the essential elements of the offence. Knowing those elements is your best weapon.
Fraud Offence: Article 248 of the Spanish Criminal Code
Art. 248 CP defines fraud as the use of "sufficient deception" to mislead another person, causing them to perform an act of disposing of assets to their own or another person's detriment, with intent to profit. Three key elements:
- Sufficient deception: Not every lie amounts to fraud. The deception must be capable of misleading a person of average diligence.
- Antecedent intent: The intention to deceive must exist BEFORE receiving the money. If the intention not to pay arises later, there is no fraud.
- Intent to profit: There must be an intention to obtain an unlawful benefit.
Crime or Civil Debt? The Key Battle
This is the decisive question in most of the fraud cases we defend. Thousands of businesses fail every year, leaving unpaid debts behind. That is NOT fraud, it is civil insolvency. For there to be a criminal offence, the prosecution must prove the antecedent intent: that the defendant already knew, before signing the contract, that they were not going to fulfil it.
Subsequent intent (deciding not to pay later because of supervening financial difficulties) is not criminally punishable. Our job is to reconstruct the chronology to show that the initial will was to comply.
The Penalties: When They Are Aggravated
The penalties vary significantly depending on the amount and the circumstances:
- Basic fraud (over EUR 400): 6 months to 3 years in prison.
- Aggravated fraud (over EUR 50,000): 1 to 6 years in prison.
- Highly aggravated fraud (over EUR 250,000): 4 to 8 years in prison.
Aggravating circumstances include: abuse of personal relationships, harm to essential goods (the family home), procedural fraud and multi-recidivism.
The Three Pillars of the Defence
At our firm we deploy a defence strategy based on three pillars:
- Criminal atypicality: Showing that there was no prior deception and steering the case back to the civil courts.
- Victim's own error: A defence based on the duty of self-protection. If the victim did not carry out the minimum checks that could be expected, the deception may not be "sufficient".
- Reparation of damage: Depositing the amount claimed with the court before trial so as to obtain a highly qualified mitigating factor, reducing the penalty by one or two degrees.
Mistakes You Must NOT Make
- Making a statement without a lawyer: your police statement can be used against you. Exercise your right to remain silent.
- Destroying evidence: This is an additional offence and raises suspicion of guilt.
- Contacting the victim: It can be interpreted as intimidation or threats.
- Ignoring the court summons: It can lead to an arrest warrant.
Returning the Money Can Reduce the Sentence
Reparation of damage is an extremely powerful tool in property offences. It does not imply admitting guilt, but if there is a conviction, the penalty is reduced drastically. This is what we call "consignación ad cautelam": depositing the amount claimed with the court as insurance against a possible adverse ruling.
Accused of Fraud? Act Now
Every day you spend without preparing your defence is a day the prosecution uses to strengthen its case. Our specialist criminal fraud lawyers analyse your situation from the very first minute.
Call us: 91 078 65 74
Need a criminal defence lawyer?
If you are facing a criminal matter, our team of specialist lawyers can help you. Contact us for a case evaluation.
Frequently asked questions
What elements does the offence of fraud require?
Art. 248 CP requires three elements: sufficient deceit, capable of inducing error in a person of average diligence; antecedent intent, meaning the intention to deceive exists before receiving the money; and the intent to profit, the intention to obtain an unlawful benefit.
When is an unpaid debt fraud and when is it a civil matter?
This is the decisive question. For there to be an offence, the prosecution must prove antecedent intent: that the accused already knew, before signing the contract, that they would not perform. If the decision not to pay arises afterwards due to supervening financial problems (subsequent intent), there is no fraud, but a civil insolvency that is not criminally punishable.
What are the pillars of the defence against a fraud charge?
Three: criminal atypicality, showing there was no prior deceit and steering the case to the civil courts; the victim's error, based on the duty of self-protection where they failed to carry out the minimum required checks; and repair of the harm, by depositing the claimed amount with the court before the trial.
Does returning the money reduce the sentence for fraud?
Yes. Repair of the harm is a powerful tool in property offences: it does not imply admitting guilt, but if there is a conviction the sentence is reduced, and it can operate as a highly qualified mitigating factor lowering the penalty by one or two degrees. It is arranged by depositing the claimed amount with the court before the trial.
What mistakes should I avoid if accused of fraud?
Do not give a statement without a lawyer, as a police statement can be used against you; do not destroy evidence, which is an additional offence; do not contact the victim, as it may be interpreted as intimidation or threats; and do not ignore the court summons, which may lead to an arrest warrant.
Do I need a fraud lawyer in Spain, or is this just a scam accusation?
It is worth instructing a fraud lawyer in Spain as soon as you receive a court summons, whether the case is described as fraud or as a scam, because the same conduct can be criminal fraud under Art. 248 CP or merely a civil debt, and only a specialist can identify which one applies to your situation before you make any statement.
Do you need criminal defense in this area?
We are criminal defense lawyers specializing in fraud (scams). We act urgently to protect your rights.