Deadlocked 50/50 Company in Spain: Criminal and Commercial Solutions
Last updated:
listIn this article
lightbulbKey Takeaways
- check_circle50/50 company
- check_circleJudicial dissolution
- check_circleUnfair administration
- check_circleDual criminal-commercial strategy
Quick answer
When two shareholders each hold 50% of the capital and the relationship breaks down, the company is paralysed: accounts are not approved, directorships are not renewed and directors may become personally liable for the debts if they fail to promote the company's dissolution (Art. 367 LSC). Commercial law offers ways out such as judicial dissolution for the paralysis of the corporate bodies (Art. 363.1.d LSC), the appointment of a judicial administrator, mediation or the sale of shares. As leverage, the criminal route is used: unfaithful management (Art. 252 CP), denial of a shareholder's rights (Art. 293 CP), falsification of accounts (Art. 290 CP) or coercion (Art. 172 CP).
Need help with your case? Talk to a criminal defense lawyer at Alonso Sala.
Corporate deadlock is one of the most destructive situations in Spanish commercial law. When two shareholders each hold 50% of the capital and the relationship breaks down, the company is paralysed: resolutions cannot be passed at the General Meeting, the annual accounts are not approved, the management body is not renewed. As criminal lawyers, we know the ways out — and the criminal tools shareholders use as leverage.
How Does Deadlock Arise?
A 50/50 deadlock builds up over months or years through a gradual deterioration of the relationship. The most frequent causes: strategic differences, inequality of dedication, disputes over the shareholder-director's remuneration, accounting distrust, and the entry of third parties (spouses, heirs, new investors).
Consequences of Deadlock
- Inability to approve accounts: the annual accounts are not filed, which can lead to the closure of the company's registry page.
- Lapsing of offices: directors are not renewed and their power of representation weakens before banks and third parties.
- Personal liability: directors may be personally liable for company debts if they fail to promote dissolution when a legal cause concurs (Art. 367 LSC).
- Loss of value: clients, suppliers and employees flee an ungovernable company.
Deadlock as a weapon
In practice, the shareholder who controls daily operations and "stops the company working" is usually the one who wants to buy out the other at a knock-down price. Deadlocking the company to force a low sale may constitute unfair administration (Art. 252 CP).
Solutions Through the Commercial Route
- Judicial dissolution (Art. 363.1.d LSC): any shareholder may ask the court to dissolve the company for paralysis of the corporate bodies.
- Appointment of a judicial administrator to manage the company while the conflict is resolved.
- Mediation or arbitration, where the articles of association provide for dispute-resolution clauses.
- Sale negotiation: shotgun clauses or valuation by an independent expert.
The Criminal Route as Leverage
A criminal complaint is increasingly used as a strategic tool in 50/50 corporate conflicts. Conduct that may constitute an offence: unfair administration (if the shareholder-director diverts clients or self-awards a disproportionate salary); denial of rights (Art. 293 CP, preventing the other shareholder from accessing the accounts); falsification of accounts (Art. 290 CP); and coercion (Art. 172 CP). The complaint pursues a criminal sanction and, above all, generates negotiating leverage.
A deadlocked 50/50 company?
We design a dual criminal-commercial strategy to unblock your company.
📞 Call us: +34 91 078 65 74
gavelDo you need criminal defense in this area?
We are criminal defense lawyers specializing in corporate crimes. We act urgently to protect your rights.