DAOs: Criminal Liability in Decentralised Organisations
Last updated:
listIn this article
lightbulbKey Takeaways
- check_circleToken Holder Liability
- check_circleDe facto administrator
- check_circleIrregular company
- check_circleBlockchain trail
DAOs (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations) manage millionaire treasuries through smart contracts and token voting, without a CEO or registered office. But when a DAO is used to launder money or defraud investors, the prosecutor cannot indict the 'code'. Who pays the price?
Piercing the Veil of Decentralization
The defense strategy of "it's a DAO, there are no responsible parties" is failing. Regulators are targeting:
- Key Developers: Those who wrote and deployed the initial code.
- Governance Holders: Those with enough tokens to decisively influence votes. They are beginning to be treated as de facto administrators of an irregular company.
Risk of Illicit Association
If the DAO's main purpose is to commit illicit acts (e.g., a DAO created to coordinate DDoS attacks or move stolen funds), active participation in governance could be equated to membership in a criminal organization. The mere fact of voting "yes" to a criminal proposal leaves an immutable trail on the blockchain that serves as prosecution evidence.
Need a criminal defence lawyer?
If you are facing a criminal matter, our team of specialist defence lawyers can help. Contact us for a case assessment.
gavelDo you need criminal defense in this area?
We are criminal defense lawyers specializing in dao criminal liability. We act urgently to protect your rights.