personal_injuryPractice Area
Physical & Psychological Mistreatment
Technical defense against mistreatment accusations. We differentiate specific couple conflict from criminal violence.
Beyond the Blow: Psychological Violence
Most current complaints are not based on serious physical injury reports, but on accusations of psychological mistreatment: insults, belittling, mobile control, or social isolation ("Gaslighting").
Defense Strategy
- check_circleContextualization: We provide full WhatsApp conversations to demonstrate that insults were mutual (reciprocity) in a couple argument context, downgrading the fact to a minor offense or mitigating the penalty.
- check_circlePsychological Expert Report: In accusations of habitual mistreatment, we demand an expert report proving the "psychological footprint" on the victim. Without proven sequelae, the accusation loses strength.
The Prosecution Evidence
The Supreme Court establishes that the victim's statement can be sufficient evidence to convict, but it must meet three requirements (Credibility Test):
Absence of IncredibilityIs there a spurious motive? (Hatred, revenge, advantage in divorce).
VerisimilitudeAre there peripheral corroborations? (Medical reports, witnesses, messages).
PersistenceDoes she maintain the same version without contradictions over time?
shield
Specialized Technical Defense
In mistreatment cases, detail makes the difference. We analyze every message, every contradiction, and every medical report to protect your presumption of innocence.
- checkForensic psychologist experts.
- checkRecovery of deleted messages.
The Prosecution Evidence
The Supreme Court establishes that the victim's statement can be sufficient evidence to convict, but it must meet three requirements (Credibility Test):
Absence of IncredibilityIs there a spurious motive? (Hatred, revenge, advantage in divorce).
VerisimilitudeAre there peripheral corroborations? (Medical reports, witnesses, messages).
PersistenceDoes she maintain the same version without contradictions over time?
Occasional (153) vs Habitual (173.2) Mistreatment
It is vital to distinguish between an isolated episode of conflict (Art. 153) and a state of permanent aggression (Art. 173.2). The prosecution will try to add up several isolated episodes to build a crime of habituality, which carries much more serious penalties (up to 3 years in prison).
Our defense focuses on uncoupling the facts, demonstrating that they were specific conflicts motivated by couple crises (breakup, jealousy) and not a pattern of male domination. If we manage to break the link of habituality, the possible penalty is drastically reduced.
Forensic Reports and Medical Protocol
If there is an injury report, we rigorously analyze the causal mechanism. Often, defensive marks (scratches on the man's arms) are ignored or misinterpreted. We collaborate with medical experts to demonstrate if her injuries are compatible with her account or if they could be self-inflicted or accidental during a defensive struggle.
gavel
Why Alonso & Sala for Habitual Mistreatment?
Habitual mistreatment defense Art. 173.2: break habituality link + victim credibility test + psychological expert contradiction.
- psychologyBreak habituality link degrade Art. 153 isolated episode: CRUCIAL difference Art. 153 (6m-1y) vs Art. 173.2 (6m-3y). Habituality requires permanent domination pattern NOT specific facts. Defense: unlink episodes demonstrating couple conflicts breakup crisis + jealousy NOT terror climate. Family witnesses normal coexistence intermediate periods. Affectionate messages contradict supposed continuous mistreatment. Psychological expert: absence battered woman syndrome victim. If we break link = degradation isolated episode 153 suspendable penalty vs habituality 173.2 effective prison probable. 50-70% penalty reduction.
- psychologyQuestion victim testimony credibility test STS: Supreme Court credibility test 3 CUMULATIVE requirements: 1) Absence incredibility (spurious revenge motive + divorce advantage). 2) Verisimilitude (peripheral corroborations medical reports + witnesses). 3) Persistence (same version no contradictions). Defense: demonstrate contentious divorce procedure prior = spurious motive. Analyze contradictions police statements + investigating court + oral trial. Psychological expert: victim testimony presents simulation traits + symptom exaggeration. Peripheral corroboration absence: NO medical reports facts time + witnesses contradict version. If 1 requirement breaks = reasonable doubt acquittal.
- psychologyForensic psychological expert party report contradiction: victim provides private psychologist report diagnoses post-traumatic stress + anxiety. Prosecutor assumes valid. Defense: forensic psychologist independent expert counterproof analyzes party report methodology. We question: single interview no objective data contrast. Based exclusively victim subjective account no witnesses. Does NOT use validated standardized tests (MMPI + PAI). Categorical diagnostic conclusions without ruling out simulation + histrionic personality traits. Our expert: evaluates accused + victim (if accepts) + message analysis + third party testimonies. Objective report: habitual psychological mistreatment indicators absence victim + accused personality profile NOT compatible abuser. Court values counter-expert = reasonable doubt.
quiz
FAQs
What is 'physical mistreatment'?expand_more
It's any act of physical violence that doesn't cause an injury requiring medical treatment. A push, a slap, a grab... even if they don't leave a mark, are a crime in the context of gender-based violence (Art. 153 CP).
What if the argument was mutual?expand_more
It's a common defense. We provide messages or witnesses that prove reciprocity in the aggression or insults. Although the law is not symmetrical, showing you weren't the sole aggressor can mitigate the penalty or lead to a conviction for reciprocal minor assault.
How is habitual psychological mistreatment proven?expand_more
It's the hardest to prove. It requires demonstrating a continued 'climate of violence'. Key evidence includes witnesses from the environment (neighbors, family), psychologists' reports attesting to the 'psychological footprint' on the victim, and recordings of arguments.
Is it a crime to control my partner's phone?expand_more
Yes. It can be an indication of habitual mistreatment (control) or even an autonomous crime of discovery of secrets (Art. 197 CP) if you access their messages without permission.
What is the penalty for a push?expand_more
In the context of gender-based violence, as it is physical mistreatment (Art. 153 CP), the penalty is 6 months to 1 year in prison, which is usually suspended if there are no prior records, but it implies a restraining order and a criminal record.
Is 'gaslighting' a crime?expand_more
Making the victim doubt her own judgment or perception of reality ('you're crazy', 'that never happened') is a form of psychological mistreatment that, if habitual and serious, is integrated into the crime of Art. 173.2 CP.
And economic violence?expand_more
Controlling a partner's money, preventing her from working, or not providing for the family's needs can also be a form of habitual mistreatment, by creating a situation of domination and humiliation.
If I defend myself, is it mistreatment?expand_more
Self-defense is valid, but must be proportional. If she attacks you and you push her to distance her, it's defense. If she scratches you and you punch her, there is excess. It is vital to report your injuries immediately too.
What if I shout or insult in a heated argument?expand_more
If it is minor ('stupid', 'idiot') and specific, it may be a minor crime of unjust vexations (Art. 173.4). If serious or habitual, it enters psychological mistreatment. Context is key for defense.
Can I record in my own house?expand_more
Yes. Recordings of conversations or situations where you participate in your home are legal and valid evidence in court, even if she doesn't know you are recording. You cannot record if you are not present (hidden cameras).
What value do private psychological reports have?expand_more
The report she brings from her private psychologist is questionable. We can provide a counter-expert report analyzing if the methodology was correct or based only on her subjective account without objective evidence.
If she has no visible injuries, can I be convicted?expand_more
Yes. Art. 153 punishes mistreatment 'without causing injury'. A credible testimony plus a medical report of anxiety or auditory witnesses may suffice. That is why counter-evidence (our version) must be solid.
What is the 416 LECrim exemption?expand_more
It is the victim's right not to testify against her spouse. If she avails herself of this right at trial and there is no other evidence (witnesses, medical reports), the Prosecution is left without evidence and acquittal must be requested.
Do alcohol or drugs mitigate the penalty?expand_more
Yes, if it is proven that at the time of the facts your faculties were impaired. It can be a mitigating factor that lowers the penalty, but does not eliminate the crime or the restraining order.
Can I ask for shared custody with a conviction?expand_more
No. The Civil Code prohibits shared custody to the parent convicted of gender violence. You must wait to cancel records to request it again. Hence the vital importance of avoiding conviction.
What is the kinship aggravating factor?expand_more
In gender violence it is usually implicit in the penal type (that is why penalties are higher). It should not be added twice (non bis in idem), our job is to ensure the Prosecution does not apply it improperly.
Can I be arrested at work?expand_more
Police can arrest you where they find you, but usually prefer to cite you or go to your home if there is no imminent risk. If they go to work, we will try to make it as discreet as possible, but police priority is victim protection.
If it is my word against hers?expand_more
In theory, in dubio pro reo (in doubt, for the defendant). In practice, in gender violence, the victim's testimony has a lot of weight. We need to find 'cracks' in her account (contradictions, exaggerations) to generate that reasonable doubt.
If I withdraw the complaint against her, does she withdraw?expand_more
It doesn't work like that. These are public crimes. Once reported, the process continues even if parties want to stop (unless they use the exemption). Cross-withdrawals cannot be legally 'negotiated'.
Need Immediate and Expert Legal Assistance?
The judicial system is complex and can be relentless. Do not face it alone. We have the experience, technical knowledge, and human resources necessary to fight for you. Contact us today to schedule a confidential consultation and start building your defense.
Contact Alonso Sala